Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Allergic Reactions02:06

Allergic Reactions

Overview

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A literature review and expert consensus statement on diagnostics in suspected metal implant allergy.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2024
Same author

[Current design and cement mantle thickness in hip arthroplasty : Theory and analysis of register data].

Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)·2023
Same author

Sprague Dawley rats from different vendors vary in the modulation of prepulse inhibition of startle (PPI) by dopamine, acetylcholine, and glutamate drugs.

Psychopharmacology·2023
Same author

An interleukin-1 polymorphism additionally intensified by atopy as prognostic factor for aseptic non-mechanical complications in metal knee and hip arthroplasty.

Frontiers in immunology·2022
Same author

Interaction with St. John's wort due to exposure with blackcurrant aroma? How not to present a case report of an adverse event.

Die Pharmazie·2019
Same author

Nickel contact dermatitis evaluated by means of optical coherence tomography: first impressions.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Chronic Implantation of Multiple Flexible Polymer Electrode Arrays
08:54

Chronic Implantation of Multiple Flexible Polymer Electrode Arrays

Published on: October 4, 2019

[Implant allergy register--a first report].

R Eben1, R Walk, B Summer

  • 1Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Frauenlobstrasse 9-11, 80337, München, Deutschland. Ricarda.Eben@med.uni-muenchen.de

Der Orthopade
|May 27, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Metal implant allergy is diagnosed in 29.6% of patients presenting with implant issues. Patch testing with implant metals and bone cement components is recommended to confirm allergy after ruling out other causes.

More Related Videos

Subcutaneous Trigeminal Nerve Field Stimulation for Refractory Facial Pain
09:35

Subcutaneous Trigeminal Nerve Field Stimulation for Refractory Facial Pain

Published on: May 10, 2017

Animal Model of Implant-Associated Infections in Mice
07:02

Animal Model of Implant-Associated Infections in Mice

Published on: June 27, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Chronic Implantation of Multiple Flexible Polymer Electrode Arrays
08:54

Chronic Implantation of Multiple Flexible Polymer Electrode Arrays

Published on: October 4, 2019

Subcutaneous Trigeminal Nerve Field Stimulation for Refractory Facial Pain
09:35

Subcutaneous Trigeminal Nerve Field Stimulation for Refractory Facial Pain

Published on: May 10, 2017

Animal Model of Implant-Associated Infections in Mice
07:02

Animal Model of Implant-Associated Infections in Mice

Published on: June 27, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Dermatology
  • Toxicology

Context:

  • Metal implant allergy is a growing concern, with limited large-scale data on prevalence and triggers.
  • Case reports exist, but comprehensive observational studies are lacking.

Purpose:

  • To investigate the frequency and characteristics of metal implant allergies.
  • To identify common allergens and clinical presentations in patients with suspected implant hypersensitivity.

Summary:

  • A 5-year metal allergy registry collected data on 239 patients with suspected implant allergies.
  • Metal allergy was confirmed in 29.6% of patients, with 24.8% allergic to bone cement components.
  • Observed reactions included inflammatory responses to metal particles and symptom resolution after revision surgery with titanium implants.

Impact:

  • Recommends patch testing with implant metals and bone cement for diagnosing implant allergy.
  • Highlights the importance of considering metal hypersensitivity in patients with unexplained implant-related symptoms.
  • Suggests titanium-based materials may be suitable for patients with known metal allergies.