Fundamental differences of substrate hydroxylation by high-valent iron(IV)-oxo models of cytochrome P450
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Monitoring the Reductive and Oxidative Half-Reactions of a Flavin-Dependent Monooxygenase using Stopped-Flow Spectrophotometry
Published on: March 18, 2012
Laleh Tahsini1, Mojtaba Bagherzadeh, Wonwoo Nam
1The Manchester Interdisciplinary Biocenter and the School of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Science, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
An Iron(IV)-oxo heme(+*) complex (Compound I, Cpd I) is the proposed active species of heme enzymes such as the cytochromes P450 and is elusive; therefore, biomimetic studies on active site mimics give valuable insight into the fundamental properties of heme active species. In this work we present density functional theory (DFT) calculations on substrate hydroxylation by a Compound I mimic [Fe(IV)=O(Por(+*))Cl] and its one-electron reduced form [Fe(IV)=O(Por)Cl](-). Thus, recent experimental studies showed that [Fe(IV)=O(Por)Cl](-) is able to react with substrates via hydride transfer reactions [Jeong, Y. J.; Kang, Y.; Han, A.-R.; Lee, Y.-M.; Kotani, H.; Fukuzumi, S.; Nam, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7321-7324]. By contrast, theoretical studies on camphor hydroxylation by these two oxidants concluded that the one-electron reduced form of Compound I is a sluggish oxidant of hydroxylation reactions [Altun, A.; Shaik, S.; Thiel, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 8978-8987]. To resolve the question why the one-electron reduced Compound I is an oxidant in one case and a sluggish oxidant in other cases, we have performed a DFT study on 10-methyl-9,10-dihydro acridine (AcrH(2)) hydroxylation by [Fe(IV)=O(Por(+*))Cl] and [Fe(IV)=O(Por)Cl](-). The calculations presented in this work show that both [Fe(IV)=O(Por(+*))Cl] and [Fe(IV)=O(Por)Cl](-) are plausible oxidants, but [Fe(IV)=O(Por(+*))Cl] reacts via much lower reaction barriers. Moreover, [Fe(IV)=O(Por(+*))Cl] reacts via hydride transfer, while [Fe(IV)=O(Por)Cl](-) by hydrogen abstraction. The differences between hydride and hydrogen atom transfer reactions have been rationalized with thermodynamic cycles and shown to be the result of differences in electron abstraction abilities of the two oxidants. Thus, the calculations predict that [Fe(IV)=O(Por)Cl](-) is only able to hydroxylate weak C-H bonds, whereas [Fe(IV)=O(Por(+*))Cl] is more versatile.
More Related Videos
09:33Formation of Covalent DNA Adducts by Enzymatically Activated Carcinogens and Drugs In Vitro and Their Determination by 32P-postlabeling
Published on: March 20, 2018
10:01Protein Film Infrared Electrochemistry Demonstrated for Study of H2 Oxidation by a [NiFe] Hydrogenase
Published on: December 4, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Electron Transport Chain: Complex III and IV
Drug Metabolism: Phase I Reactions
Oxidation of Phenols to Quinones
o-hydroxy phenols are oxidized to o-quinones and p-hydroxy phenols to p-quinones. Such redox reactions involve the transfer of two electrons and two protons. The reversible redox property is crucial in...
Pharmacogenetics of Phase I Enzymes: Cytochrome P450 Isozymes
Phase I Oxidative Reactions: Overview
Oxidation of Alkenes: Syn Dihydroxylation with Osmium Tetraoxide