Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Blood pressure variables and cardiovascular risk: new findings from ADVANCE
Andre-Pascal Kengne1, Sébastien Czernichow, Rachel Huxley
1ADVANCE Collaborative Group, The George Institute for International Health, PO Box M201, Missenden Road, Sydney NSW 2050, Australia.
Insights
Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and pulse pressure (PP) are key indicators for cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes patients. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) is less effective, with SBP being the simplest predictor.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Endocrinology
- Vascular Medicine
Background:
- Cardiovascular risk stratification in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) requires understanding the impact of various blood pressure indices.
- Previous research has not definitively established the relative importance of different blood pressure measures on cardiovascular outcomes in T2DM.
- The Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron-Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) study provides a large cohort for this investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the predictive strength of baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), pulse pressure (PP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) for major cardiovascular events in T2DM patients.
- To determine which blood pressure index is the most effective determinant of cardiovascular risk in this population.
- To evaluate the utility of achieved blood pressure values versus baseline values in risk prediction.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 11,140 participants from the ADVANCE study with a mean follow-up of 4.3 years.
- Statistical comparison of hazard ratios for major cardiovascular events associated with increments in SBP, DBP, PP, and MAP.
- Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to compare the discriminatory ability of different blood pressure indices.
- Assessment of risk prediction models using both baseline and achieved blood pressure measurements.
Main Results:
- Higher hazard ratios for major cardiovascular events were associated with increments in SBP (1.17) and PP (1.20) compared to MAP (1.12) and DBP (1.04).
- ROC curve analysis indicated slightly better discrimination for SBP and PP than MAP and DBP for major cardiovascular and coronary events.
- Using achieved blood pressure values offered marginal improvements for SBP, DBP, and MAP, but did not significantly alter the predictive performance compared to PP.
Conclusions:
- Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and pulse pressure (PP) are the most significant determinants of major cardiovascular outcomes in older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
- Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) demonstrated the least effectiveness in predicting cardiovascular risk in this cohort.
- SBP emerges as the simplest and most broadly applicable predictor of cardiovascular risk across diverse age groups and populations with T2DM.
Abstract:
The relative importance of various blood pressure indices on cardiovascular risk in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus has not been established. This study compares the strengths of the associations between different baseline blood pressure variables (systolic blood pressure [SBP], diastolic blood pressure [DBP], pulse pressure [PP], and mean arterial pressure) and the 4.3-year risk of major cardiovascular events in the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron-Modified Release Controlled Evaluation Study. Mean (SD) age for the 11 140 participants was 65.8 years (6.4 years). During follow-up, 1000 major cardiovascular events, 559 major coronary events, and 468 cardiovascular deaths were recorded. After adjustment for age, sex, and treatment allocation, the hazard ratios (95% CIs) associated with 1 increment in SD for the risk of major cardiovascular events were 1.17 (1.10 to 1.24) for SBP; 1.20 (1.13 to 1.28) for PP; 1.12 (1.05 to 1.19) for mean arterial pressure; and 1.04 (0.98 to 1.11) for DBP. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were slightly higher for SBP and PP compared with mean arterial pressure and DBP for major cardiovascular and coronary events. Using achieved instead of baseline blood pressure values marginally improved the effect estimates for SBP, DBP, and mean arterial pressure, with no significant differences in the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve between models with SBP and those with PP. In conclusion, SBP and PP are the 2 best and DBP is the least effective determinant of the risk of major cardiovascular outcomes in the relatively old patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus participating in the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron-Modified Release Controlled Evaluation Study. However, SBP may be the simplest and most useful predictor across a wider range of age groups and populations.
Related Concept Videos
Factors affecting Blood pressure
Physiological Factors:
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
