Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Diagnostic errors in mammography. I. False negative results].

D Morrone1, D Ambrogetti, P Bravetti

  • 1Centro per lo Studio e la Prevenzione Oncologica, Firenze.

La Radiologia Medica
|September 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Incidence and risk factors of bacterial sepsis and invasive fungal infection in neonates and infants requiring major surgery: an Italian multicentre prospective study.

The Journal of hospital infection·2022
Same author

Aesthetic results following breast cancer surgery: A prospective study on 6515 cases from ten Italian Senonetwork breast centers.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2020
Same author

Reply letter to Dr. Xu et al. on role of circulating endothelial progenitor cells in the reparative mechanisms of stable ischemic myocardium.

International journal of cardiology·2018
Same author

Role of circulating endothelial progenitor cells in the reparative mechanisms of stable ischemic myocardium.

International journal of cardiology·2017
Same author

Time trends (2006-2015) of quality indicators in EUSOMA-certified breast centres.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2017
Same author

Alpha Glucosidase Assay on Dried Blood Spot in the Early Diagnosis of Infantile Pompe Disease.

Journal of neuromuscular diseases·2016
Same journal

Request and reporting models for computed tomography in the multidisciplinary management of cancer patients: consensus between the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM) and the Italian Society of Medical Oncology (AIOM).

La Radiologia medica·2026
Same journal

Functional hyperpolarized gas magnetic resonance imaging of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review.

La Radiologia medica·2026
Same journal

Will AI systems replace radiologists? An "old" radiologist discusses the future of radiology with ChatGPT.

La Radiologia medica·2026
Same journal

LiT-WSAG: high-precision 3D liver tumor segmentation via 2D training and 3D reconstruction.

La Radiologia medica·2026
Same journal

Diagnostic performance of bpMRI versus mpMRI and AI-assisted bpMRI in prostate cancer detection: a multi-reader study.

La Radiologia medica·2026
Same journal

A novel deep learning-based grading system for assessing breast arterial calcification on mammograms, as an independent risk factor for predicting adverse cardiovascular events.

La Radiologia medica·2026
See all related articles

Mammography shows 88% sensitivity in detecting breast cancer, with accuracy varying by tumor stage and patient age. Younger women and those with dense breasts may require additional diagnostic tests for improved accuracy.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Oncology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Mammography is a key tool for breast cancer screening.
  • Assessing mammography's diagnostic accuracy is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
  • Understanding factors influencing sensitivity can enhance early detection rates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the sensitivity of mammography in detecting breast cancer.
  • To identify factors influencing mammographic sensitivity, including tumor stage, patient age, and radiologist experience.
  • To analyze the causes of false-negative mammograms and radiologic errors.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 1455 breast cancer cases diagnosed between 1985-1987.
  • Analysis of mammograms taken up to 6 months prior to diagnosis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of false-negative cases and mammographic errors to identify radiologic faults.

    • Main Results:

    • Overall mammography sensitivity was 88%, influenced by tumor stage and patient age.
    • Sensitivity was lower in younger women (<40 years) and higher in older women (>59 years).
    • Full-time radiologist involvement correlated with higher sensitivity (92% vs. 88%).
    • Benign-appearing lesions were the most common false-negative finding (49.4%).
    • Technical errors (lesion omission, poor technique) accounted for a small percentage of false negatives.
    • 29% of false-negative cases showed no visible lesion even upon review, particularly in younger women or those with dense breasts.

    Conclusions:

    • Mammography demonstrates good sensitivity but requires a more cautious approach in younger women.
    • The study highlights the importance of supplementary diagnostic tests when minimal doubt exists.
    • Full-time radiologist specialization in mammography and breast imaging can improve diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy.