Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Acceptable risk as a basis for regulation.

P H Murphy1

  • 1Nuclear Medicine Service, St Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, TX 77030.

Radiographics : a Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc
|September 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hemodialysis in a patient being treated with 153Sm.

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine·2001
Same author

Validation of a knowledge-based boundary detection algorithm: a multicenter study.

European journal of nuclear medicine·1996
Same author

Clinical applications of nuclear medicine in gastroenterology.

Gastroenterology nursing : the official journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates·1994
Same author

Relationship of field dependence/independence with learning styles and locus of control among registered nurses.

Perceptual and motor skills·1993
Same author

Lines from the president: dispelling the confusion about radiation safety in medicine.

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine·1993
Same author

Attenuation properties of lead composite aprons.

Radiology·1993

Radiation protection guidelines increasingly use risk estimates. However, large uncertainties in these estimates can lead to overly restrictive regulations, impacting radiation safety philosophy.

Area of Science:

  • Radiation protection
  • Risk assessment
  • Regulatory science

Background:

  • Modern radiation protection guidelines rely on risk estimation and acceptable risk judgments.
  • This risk-based approach aims for objectivity in regulations.
  • However, the accuracy of risk estimates is crucial for effective regulation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the increasing reliance on risk-based approaches in radiation protection.
  • To highlight the potential pitfalls of overlooking uncertainties in risk estimates.
  • To examine recent examples illustrating current radiation safety philosophy.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current radiation protection guidelines and regulatory frameworks.
  • Analysis of risk assessment methodologies in radiation safety.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Case study examination of recent radiation protection guideline applications.

    • Main Results:

    • Radiation protection guidelines are increasingly based on risk estimates.
    • Significant uncertainties exist within these risk estimates.
    • Overlooked uncertainties can lead to unreasonable and restrictive regulatory applications.

    Conclusions:

    • The current risk-based radiation safety philosophy requires careful consideration of estimation uncertainties.
    • Uncertainties may lead to suboptimal or overly stringent regulations.
    • A balanced approach is needed to ensure effective and appropriate radiation protection.