Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Published on: May 9, 2025
Characterization of virologic failure patients on darunavir/ritonavir in treatment-experienced patients
Sandra De Meyer1, Erkki Lathouwers, Inge Dierynck
1Tibotec BVBA, Mechelen, Belgium bJanssen-Cilag BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. sdmeyer@its.jnj.com
Objective:
Characterization of resistance development in virologic failure patients on the protease inhibitor darunavir administered with low-dose ritonavir (DRV/r) in the 48-week analysis of TMC114/r In Treatment-experienced pAtients Naive to lopinavir (TITAN).
Design:
TITAN is a randomized, controlled, open-label, phase III, noninferiority trial comparing the efficacy and safety of DRV/r with that of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in HIV-1-infected, treatment-experienced, LPV-naive patients. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA less than 400 copies/ml at week 48.
Methods:
Patients received DRV/r 600/100 mg twice daily (n = 298) or LPV/r 400/100 mg twice daily (n = 297), and an optimized background regimen. Patients who lost or never achieved HIV-1 RNA less than 400 copies/ml after week 16 were considered virologic failure patients. Genotyping and phenotyping were performed.
Results:
The virologic failure rate in the DRV/r arm (10%, n = 31) was lower than in the LPV/r arm (22%, n = 65). Furthermore, fewer virologic failure patients in the DRV/r arm than in the LPV/r arm developed primary protease inhibitor mutations (6 vs. 20) or nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance-associated mutations (4 vs. 15). In addition, fewer virologic failure patients on DRV/r than on LPV/r lost susceptibility to the protease inhibitor (3 vs. 13) or nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor(s) (3 vs. 14) used in the treatment regimen or to other protease inhibitors. Most DRV/r-treated virologic failure patients retained susceptibility to all protease inhibitors.
Conclusion:
In treatment-experienced, LPV-naive patients, the overall virologic failure rate in the DRV/r arm was low and was associated with limited resistance development. These findings showed that the use of DRV/r in earlier lines of treatment was less likely to lead to cross-resistance to other protease inhibitors compared with LPV/r.
Insights
Darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) showed a lower virologic failure rate and less resistance development compared to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in treatment-experienced HIV patients. This indicates DRV/r is less likely to cause cross-resistance to other protease inhibitors.
Area of Science:
- HIV/AIDS research
- Antiretroviral therapy
- Virology
Background:
- Treatment-experienced HIV-1 patients often face challenges with drug resistance.
- Protease inhibitors (PIs) like darunavir (DRV) and lopinavir (LPV) are key components of antiretroviral therapy (ART).
- Understanding resistance patterns is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize resistance development in patients experiencing virologic failure on DRV/r.
- To compare resistance patterns between DRV/r and LPV/r in treatment-experienced, LPV-naive patients.
- To evaluate the impact of DRV/r on cross-resistance to other PIs.
Main Methods:
- The TITAN trial was a phase III, randomized, controlled, open-label study.
- Compared DRV/r (600/100 mg BID) with LPV/r (400/100 mg BID) in HIV-1-infected, treatment-experienced, LPV-naive patients.
- Virologic failure was defined as HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL after week 16; genotyping and phenotyping were performed.
Main Results:
- Virologic failure occurred in 10% of DRV/r patients versus 22% of LPV/r patients.
- Fewer DRV/r patients developed PI mutations (6 vs. 20) or NNRTI resistance (4 vs. 15).
- DRV/r failure was associated with less loss of susceptibility to PIs compared to LPV/r.
Conclusions:
- DRV/r demonstrated a low virologic failure rate with limited resistance development in this population.
- DRV/r use was less likely to lead to cross-resistance to other PIs compared to LPV/r.
- These findings support the use of DRV/r in earlier treatment lines for improved long-term efficacy.
Related Concept Videos
Retrovirus Life Cycles
Antiviral Nucleoside Inhibitors
Retroviruses
Subviral Agents
Inhibitors Of Virion Release
Viral Hepatitis I: Introduction

