Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Immunoassay standardization.

R Ekins1

  • 1Dept Molecular Endocrinology, University College and Middlesex School of Medicine, London, GB.

Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation. Supplementum
|January 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Thyroid hormone receptor gene expression in first trimester human fetal brain.

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·2000
Same author

The role of the dental nurse in general practice.

British dental journal·1999
Same author

On the meaning of "sensitivity".

Clinical chemistry·1997
Same author

Immunoassay and other ligand assays: present status and future trends.

Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry·1997
Same author

Immunoassay: recent developments and future directions.

Nuclear medicine and biology·1994
Same author

Analytic measurements of free thyroxine.

Clinics in laboratory medicine·1993
Same journal

Standardization of tumor markers - priorities identified through external quality assessment.

Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum·2016
Same journal

Next generation sequencing in cancer: opportunities and challenges for precision cancer medicine.

Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum·2016
Same journal

microRNAs as cancer biomarkers.

Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum·2016
Same journal

Biomarkers along the continuum of care in lung cancer.

Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum·2016
Same journal

Precision medicine: what's all the fuss about?

Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum·2016
Same journal

Serum thyroglobulin in the monitoring of differentiated thyroid cancer.

Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum·2016
See all related articles

Biological assays are either comparative (measuring biological effect) or analytical (measuring molecular amount). Analytical assays, like immunoassays, must measure single substances; mixtures invalidate results and hinder standardization efforts.

Area of Science:

  • Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Analytical Chemistry

Background:

  • Biological assays are broadly categorized into comparative (functionally-specific) and analytical (structurally-specific) types.
  • Comparative assays measure the relative effects of substances on biological systems, yielding results in units of effect.
  • Analytical assays aim to quantify the amount (number or mass) of a single, unique chemical substance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate between comparative and analytical assay methodologies.
  • To highlight the challenges and limitations of using analytical assays, particularly immunoassays, for molecularly heterogeneous substances.
  • To discuss the implications for standardization and accurate measurement in biological sciences.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Conceptual analysis of assay principles and their application.
  • Examination of the characteristics of comparative versus analytical assays.
  • Discussion of immunoassay validity concerning molecular heterogeneity and standardization.

    • Main Results:

    • Analytical assays are only valid for single substances of unique chemical structure; mixtures render them invalid.
    • Immunoassays, often categorized as analytical, can be invalidated by dissimilar or heterogeneous antigens, leading to non-universal results.
    • Standardization of "analytically-invalid" assays, especially for biologically defined but molecularly heterogeneous substances (e.g., TSH), is fundamentally flawed.

    Conclusions:

    • Accurate measurement requires analytical assays to target single molecular entities.
    • The concept of measuring a mixture of substances with differing structures and functions is scientifically meaningless.
    • Developing assay systems that measure individual components of heterogeneous mixtures is crucial for future standardization and accurate quantification.