Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy01:26

Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy

This lesson explores three gastrointestinal imaging techniques: radionuclide testing, colonic transit studies, and virtual colonoscopy.
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and solid...
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy01:25

Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy

The colon, or large intestine, is the final segment of the digestive system. Its primary functions include absorbing water and vitamins produced by gut bacteria and transforming waste from liquid to solid to form stool. In adults, the large intestine is approximately 5 feet long and consists of four main sections:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Colorectal Cancer Treatment Delay Thresholds and Metastasis Risk.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Dollars Needed to Pay per Early-Detected Colorectal Cancer Case in Stool-Based Screening.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

No-cost envelope modification improves fecal immunochemical test laboratory acceptance in a US Veterans Affairs colorectal cancer screening trial.

Journal of medical screening·2026
Same author

Neoplasia outcomes following colonoscopy for Lynch syndrome at a dedicated center vs. community centers.

Endoscopy international open·2026
Same author

In adults aged 45 to 49 y, active screening choices via patient portal reduced screening rates vs. mailed FIT at 6 mo.

Annals of internal medicine·2025
Same author

Extracellular vesicle and particle-based blood test for ovarian cancer screening of average risk population: a promising nested case control study using preclinical samples.

Gynecologic oncology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists
03:43

Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists

Published on: July 11, 2025

Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy.

Thomas F Imperiale1, Elizabeth A Glowinski, Beth E Juliar

  • 1Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
|June 2, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Polyp detection rates (PDRs) vary significantly among endoscopists performing colonoscopies. Mean procedure time (MPT) was the only factor associated with this variation, highlighting the need for further research into PDR disparities.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists
03:43

Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists

Published on: July 11, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Endoscopy Quality Improvement
  • Clinical Performance Metrics

Background:

  • Endoscopist variation in polyp detection necessitates quality standards for colonoscopy.
  • Establishing consistent polyp detection rates (PDRs) is crucial for effective colorectal cancer screening.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the variation in PDRs among endoscopists performing screening colonoscopies.
  • To identify factors associated with differences in PDRs.

Main Methods:

  • Cross-sectional analysis of summary-level data from 25 endoscopists in central Indiana.
  • Utilized multiple linear regression to identify factors influencing PDR variation, including mean procedure time (MPT).

Main Results:

  • Adenoma detection rates varied widely (7%-44%), with few high outlier endoscopists identified.
  • Mean procedure time (MPT) was the only factor significantly associated with PDR variation (36%-56% explained).

Conclusions:

  • Significant variation exists in PDRs among endoscopists, with MPT being a key associated factor.
  • Further research is required to understand the clinical significance and underlying reasons for PDR variation.