Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Induction and Evaluation of Inbreeding Crosses Using the Ant, Vollenhovia Emeryi
Published on: October 5, 2018
Honest and dishonest communication in social Hymenoptera
1Biologie I, Universität Regensburg, 93040 Regensburg, Germany. juergen.heinze@biologie.uni-regensburg.de
Abstract:
Communication in social insects usually serves the good of the whole society and thus increases the inclusive fitness of all individuals. Hence, cheating and dishonesty are not expected when nestmates are to be alarmed or recruited to food sources. However, kin selection predicts a conflict of interest among individuals about the partitioning of reproduction. Dishonest communication may then be advantageous. Workers usually do not lay eggs in the presence of a fertile queen, but in many species they do so when the queen is removed. This effect has been explained by manipulative, i.e. dishonest, queen control or honest fertility signalling. Numerous studies have documented qualitative and quantitative differences in the pheromone blends of reproductives and non-reproductives. We examine these data for signs of honest signalling, conflict and manipulation.
Related Concept Videos
Understanding Deception
Communication
Processes of Self-Presentation
Horney's Sociocultural Approach
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics

