The continued value of clinical and radiological surveillance: the Charnley Elite Plus hip replacement system at 12

B Ollivere1, C Darrah, R C Brankin

  • 1Institute of Orthopaedics Norfolk, Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK. ben@ollivere.co.uk

Insights

This 12-year follow-up of Elite Plus total hip replacements found 8.1% required revision, primarily for aseptic loosening. Radiological loosening predicted later failure, highlighting the need for regular implant surveillance.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Clinical Epidemiology

Background:

  • The Elite Plus total hip replacement (THR) is a widely used implant.
  • Previous studies reported outcomes at a mean of 6.4 years.
  • Long-term performance data is crucial for evaluating implant survivorship.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To report the 12-year clinical and radiological outcomes of the Elite Plus THR.
  • To assess the survivorship and identify predictors of failure for this total hip replacement.
  • To evaluate the association between radiological findings and clinical outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort of 217 patients (234 THRs) with Elite Plus total hip replacements were followed for 12 years.
  • Patients underwent radiological assessment and clinical evaluation using the Oxford hip score.
  • Survivorship analysis was performed to determine implant survival rates, with revision for aseptic loosening as an endpoint.

Main Results:

  • At 12 years, 19 (8.1%) THRs required revision, predominantly for aseptic loosening.
  • Implant survivorship was 88.0% at 12 years.
  • Radiological loosening of the femoral component was significantly associated with poorer Oxford hip scores and predicted later failure (p = 0.03).

Conclusions:

  • The Elite Plus THR demonstrated an 88.0% survival rate at 12 years, with aseptic loosening being the main cause for revision.
  • Radiological loosening is a significant predictor of total hip replacement failure and poorer clinical outcomes.
  • Regular medium-term radiological and clinical surveillance is recommended for early detection of implant performance issues.

Related Concept Videos