Biomarkers of response and resistance to antiangiogenic therapy

Rakesh K Jain1, Dan G Duda, Christopher G Willett

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 100 Blossom Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA. jain@steele.mgh.harvard.edu

Insights

Validated biomarkers are needed for selecting cancer patients for antiangiogenic therapy and identifying resistance pathways. Current research explores various systemic, circulating, tissue, and imaging biomarkers for improved treatment selection and monitoring.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology
  • Biomarker Discovery

Background:

  • No validated biomarkers currently exist for selecting cancer patients for antiangiogenic therapy.
  • There is a lack of biomarkers to identify tumor resistance pathways to antiangiogenic agents.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss challenges in establishing biomarkers for antiangiogenic therapy.
  • To define different types of biomarkers (systemic, circulating, tissue, imaging) and their pros and cons.
  • To explore future opportunities for validating antiangiogenic therapy biomarkers.

Main Methods:

  • Review of potential biomarkers from Phase I-III studies.
  • Categorization of biomarkers based on measurement time (baseline, during treatment).
  • Discussion of mechanistic basis and potential applications (pharmacodynamic, predictive, resistance identification).

Main Results:

  • Several potential biomarkers have emerged, including VEGF polymorphisms, hypertension, MRI-measured K(trans), and circulating angiogenic molecules.
  • Some biomarkers are pharmacodynamic (e.g., VEGF, placental growth factor), while others may predict clinical benefit or identify escape pathways (e.g., SDF-1alpha, IL-6).
  • Most biomarkers are disease and/or agent specific and require prospective validation.

Conclusions:

  • Establishing reliable biomarkers for antiangiogenic therapy is challenging.
  • Diverse biomarkers show promise but need rigorous validation.
  • Future research should focus on prospective validation of these biomarkers for clinical utility.