Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026
Transvaginal Mesh Insertion in the Ovine Model
Published on: July 27, 2017
Innovative technique for the closure of rectovaginal fistula using Surgisis mesh
O Schwandner1, A Fuerst, K Kunstreich
1Department of Surgery and Pelvic Floor Center, Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef, Regensburg, Germany. oschwandner@caritasstjosef.de
Background:
The aim of this prospective study was to analyse the efficacy of Surgisis mesh for closure of rectovaginal fistulas. Prospective data were collected from two centres.
Methods:
All patients with a rectovaginal fistula who underwent definitive surgery using Surgisis mesh were prospectively enrolled in this study. Inclusion criteria included a rectovaginal fistula in the lower two-thirds of the rectovaginal septum. Surgery was performed with a standardized technique including combined transrectal and transvaginal excision of the rectovaginal fistula with transvaginal placement of the mesh. Success was defined as closure of both internal and external (perianal and vaginal) openings, absence of drainage without further intervention, and no abscess formation.
Results:
Over a period of 16 months, a total of 21 mesh procedures were performed in two centres. The mean age of the patients was 47 years (18-59 years). Of the 21 patients, 18 (86%) had recurrent rectovaginal fistula, and the mean number of prior attempts was 2.3 (0-8). The majority of patients (nine) had Crohn's disease-associated fistula, followed by six with iatrogenic fistula, two with radiation-induced fistula, two with obstetric injury-induced fistula, and two with idiopathic fistula. The mesh procedure was performed under faecal diversion in eight patients (38%). The mean operative time was 38 min; no intraoperative morbidity occurred. Patients were discharged from hospital on day 4. After a mean follow-up of 12 months (range, 3-18 months), the overall success rate after primary mesh procedure was 71% (15/21; 6 patients had failure or recurrence). All patients with failure or recurrence were reoperated upon. Out of these six patients who were reoperated upon, four had definite healing (75%). Among the eight patients who had faecal diversion, four (50%) had reversal of their stoma.
Conclusion:
The preliminary success rate for this innovative technique using Surgisis mesh for the closure of rectovaginal fistulas is promising. Further studies are needed to assess the definite role of this novel technique in comparison to traditional surgical procedures.
