Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting01:18

Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting

The guidelines and strategies provided by the American Nurses Association (ANA) and the Canadian Nurses Association (CNA) offer essential principles for ensuring safe and secure computer charting systems in healthcare settings. Let's break down each recommendation:
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Suicide Investigations in Adult Community Mental Health Services: Mitigation of the Fear of Blame as a Barrier to Organisational Learning.

International journal of mental health nursing·2025
Same author

The process and perspective of serious incident investigations in adult community mental health services: integrative review and synthesis - ERRATUM.

BJPsych bulletin·2024
Same author

The process and perspective of serious incident investigations in adult community mental health services: integrative review and synthesis.

BJPsych bulletin·2024
Same author

Experience-based co-design-Adapting the method for a researcher-initiated study in a multi-site setting.

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy·2020
Same author

Gaps, traps, bridges and props: a mixed-methods study of resilience in the medicines management system for patients with heart failure at hospital discharge.

BMJ open·2019
Same author

Cardiology patients' medicines management networks after hospital discharge: A mixed methods analysis of a complex adaptive system.

Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP·2018
Same journal

Compassion fatigue among critical care nurses: a literature review.

Nursing management (Harrow, London, England : 1994)·2026
Same journal

Repositioning entrepreneurial competence as a core nursing capability: unlocking nurses' leadership and innovation potential.

Nursing management (Harrow, London, England : 1994)·2026
Same journal

How to design and deliver a nurse fellowship.

Nursing management (Harrow, London, England : 1994)·2026
Same journal

Relationship between leadership transparency and workplace cynicism among nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nursing management (Harrow, London, England : 1994)·2026
Same journal

Strengthening nurses' recognition of, and response to, domestic violence and abuse.

Nursing management (Harrow, London, England : 1994)·2026
Same journal

From strain to strength: enhancing the benefits of employing temporary nurses.

Nursing management (Harrow, London, England : 1994)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Quadruple-Checkerboard: A Modification of the Three-Dimensional Checkerboard for Studying Drug Combinations
11:15

Quadruple-Checkerboard: A Modification of the Three-Dimensional Checkerboard for Studying Drug Combinations

Published on: July 24, 2021

The risks of double checking.

Gerry Armitage1

  • 1Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.

Nursing Management (Harrow, London, England : 1994)
|June 3, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Double checking medications, a common nursing practice, can paradoxically lead to errors. Human error theory and aviation safety models offer insights into preventing these medication errors.

More Related Videos

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health
05:51

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health

Published on: February 21, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Quadruple-Checkerboard: A Modification of the Three-Dimensional Checkerboard for Studying Drug Combinations
11:15

Quadruple-Checkerboard: A Modification of the Three-Dimensional Checkerboard for Studying Drug Combinations

Published on: July 24, 2021

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health
05:51

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health

Published on: February 21, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare safety
  • Human factors engineering
  • Medication administration

Background:

  • Double checking medications is a standard procedure for healthcare professionals, especially nurses.
  • A study by Armitage (2003) highlighted that this practice can sometimes contribute to medication errors.
  • Understanding the underlying causes of these errors is crucial for improving patient safety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the reasons why double checking medications can lead to errors.
  • To apply principles from human error theory to medication safety.
  • To investigate potential solutions inspired by other high-risk industries, such as aviation.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of medication error reporting data (Armitage 2003).
  • Application of human error theories to the context of medication administration.
  • Comparative analysis with safety protocols in the aviation industry.

Main Results:

  • Double checking, while intended to prevent errors, can introduce new ones due to cognitive biases and system flaws.
  • Human error theories provide a framework for understanding the psychological and systemic factors involved.
  • The aviation industry's approach to safety management offers potential models for reducing medication errors.

Conclusions:

  • Rethinking the reliance on double checking as a sole safety measure is necessary.
  • Integrating human error principles can enhance medication safety protocols.
  • Adopting strategies from aviation safety may provide innovative solutions to prevent medication errors.