Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Inducing Meningococcal Meningitis Serogroup C in Mice via Intracisternal Delivery
Published on: November 5, 2019
Expanding prevention of invasive meningococcal disease
Stephen I Pelton1, Gregory P Gilmet
1Maxwell Finland Laboratory for Infectious Diseases, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA. spelton@bu.edu
Abstract:
Invasive meningococcal disease due to serogroups A, C, Y and W-135 is a serious, vaccine-preventable, worldwide public-health problem. Despite early treatment and advances in medical care, morbidity and mortality rates have essentially remained unchanged. Monovalent, meningococcal serogroup C conjugate (MCC) vaccines against Neisseria meningitidis are effective in children under 2 years of age. MCC vaccines also provide indirect protection to unvaccinated individuals through herd immunity by reducing nasopharyngeal carriage in immunized individuals. Evidence from MCC and other conjugate vaccine initiatives supports immunization initiated as a late infancy/toddler program for prevention of disease caused by serogroups C, Y and W-135. We propose that a meningococcal vaccination program focused on later infancy and the early second year of life should be the preferred approach, providing comparable effectiveness to an early-infant strategy with fewer overall doses and greater cost-effectiveness.
Insights
Implementing meningococcal conjugate vaccines in late infancy or toddlerhood effectively prevents invasive meningococcal disease. This strategy offers comparable protection to early-infant vaccination with fewer doses and better cost-effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Vaccinology
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) caused by serogroups A, C, Y, and W-135 remains a significant global health concern.
- Despite medical advancements, IMD morbidity and mortality rates remain high.
- Meningococcal serogroup C conjugate (MCC) vaccines are effective in young children and induce herd immunity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a late infancy/toddler vaccination program for IMD prevention.
- To compare the proposed strategy with early-infant immunization programs.
- To assess the cost-effectiveness of different vaccination schedules.
Main Methods:
- Review of evidence from MCC and other conjugate vaccine initiatives.
- Analysis of disease prevention, herd immunity, and carriage reduction.
- Comparative assessment of vaccination schedules and dose requirements.
Main Results:
- Late infancy/toddler immunization programs demonstrate effectiveness in preventing IMD.
- This approach provides indirect protection via herd immunity.
- The proposed strategy is associated with fewer doses and improved cost-effectiveness compared to early-infant schedules.
Conclusions:
- A meningococcal vaccination program initiated in late infancy or the early second year of life is recommended.
- This strategy offers comparable effectiveness to early-infant immunization.
- The preferred approach enhances cost-effectiveness and reduces the overall number of vaccine doses administered.
Related Concept Videos
Bacterial Meningitis
Bacterial Meningitis I: Introduction
Bacterial Meningitis II: Pathophysiology
Cryptococcal Meningitis
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Smallpox

