Transmembrane helix association affinity can be modulated by flanking and noninterfacial residues

Jinming Zhang1, Themis Lazaridis

  • 1Department of Chemistry, City College of New York/CUNY, New York, NY 10031, USA.

Biophysical Journal
|June 3, 2009
PubMed

Insights

The GxxxG motif is crucial for transmembrane helix association, but not sufficient for strong binding. Molecular dynamics simulations reveal that flanking residues and specific residue positioning significantly influence helix association affinity, explaining experimental differences between proteins like glycophorin A and M13 major coat protein.

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Transmembrane (TM) helices associate via specific sequence motifs, such as GxxxG.
  • The GxxxG motif alone is insufficient to determine strong helix association affinity.
  • Experimental data show varying association strengths for proteins with GxxxG motifs, like glycophorin A (GpA) and M13 major coat protein (MCP).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the experimentally observed differences in TM helix association affinity between GpA and MCP.
  • To investigate the role of the GxxxG motif and flanking residues in TM helix association.
  • To elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying TM helix dimerization using computational simulations.

Main Methods:

  • Molecular dynamics simulations in an implicit membrane (IMM1-GC) environment.
  • Calculation and comparison of association free energies for different TM helix constructs (GpA29, GpA15p11, MCP, MCP-GpA).
  • Analysis of the structural and energetic contributions of interfacial and non-interfacial residues, including Lys-40 deprotonation.

Main Results:

  • Calculated association free energies align with experimental observations, showing MCP-GpA affinity between GpA15p11 and wild-type MCP.
  • Identified burial of non-interfacial Lys-40 in the MCP dimer as a key factor weakening association, leading to its deprotonation.
  • Demonstrated that flanking residues significantly enhance association affinity (GpA15p11 vs. GpA29) and their positioning is critical.

Conclusions:

  • TM helix association affinity is modulated by factors beyond the GxxxG motif, including flanking residues and their precise positioning.
  • Non-interfacial residues can significantly impact helix association by influencing stability and energetics.
  • Computational simulations provide a mechanistic explanation for experimental findings on TM helix dimerization.

Related Concept Videos

Multi-pass Transmembrane Proteins and β-barrels01:09

Multi-pass Transmembrane Proteins and β-barrels

In multi-pass transmembrane proteins, the polypeptide chain crosses the membrane more than once. The transmembrane polypeptide chain either forms an α-helix or β-strand structure. α-Helix containing multi-pass transmembrane proteins are ubiquitous, whereas β-strand containing ones are mainly found in gram-negative bacteria, mitochondria, and chloroplasts.
α-Helix containing multi-pass transmembrane proteins
Multi-pass transmembrane proteins such as G-protein-linked receptors (GPCRs) and...
Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a polypeptide...
Tail-anchoring of Proteins in the ER Membrane01:45

Tail-anchoring of Proteins in the ER Membrane

Tail-anchored, or TA, proteins are estimated to make up to 3-5% of membrane proteins found in the eukaryotic cell. Such proteins have a single transmembrane domain located approximately 30 amino acid residues upstream from the C-terminal end. As a result, the signal recognition particle (SRP) cannot guide a TA protein to the ER membrane for cotranslational insertion. Hence, they are integrated into the ER membrane post-translationally using their C-terminal end as the anchor. TA proteins...
Mechanisms of Membrane Domain Formation00:59

Mechanisms of Membrane Domain Formation

Different physical properties of lipids and proteins allow them to localize and form distinct islands or domains in the membrane. Some membrane domains are formed due to protein-protein interactions, whereas others are formed due to the presence of specific lipids such as sphingolipids and sterols—for example, large proteins, such as bacteriorhodopsin, aggregate and create distinct domains.
Another mechanism for membrane domain formation involves membrane proteins interacting with cytoskeletal...
Single-pass Transmembrane Proteins01:25

Single-pass Transmembrane Proteins

Integral membrane proteins are tightly associated with the cell membrane and play a crucial role in cell communication, signaling, adhesion, and transport of the molecules. Some integral membrane proteins are present only in the membrane monolayer. For example, the enzyme fatty acid amide hydrolase is present in the cytoplasmic side of the membrane monolayer. In contrast, another type of integral membrane protein, also known as a transmembrane protein, spans across the membrane. Transmembrane...
Introduction to Membrane Proteins01:16

Introduction to Membrane Proteins

The cell membrane, or plasma membrane, is an ever-changing landscape. It is described as a fluid mosaic where various macromolecules are embedded in the phospholipid bilayer. Among the macromolecules are proteins. The protein content varies across cell types. For example, mitochondrial inner membranes contain ~76% protein content, while myelin contains ~18% protein content. Individual cells contain many types of membrane proteins—red blood cells contain over 50—and different cell types have...