Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026
08:30
X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging
Published on: September 11, 2011
Comparison of tissue equalization, and premium view post-processing methods in full field digital mammography
Baoying Chen1, Wei Wang, Jin Huang
1Department of Radiology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China. chenby128@yahoo.com
European Journal of Radiology
|June 3, 2009
Summary
Premium View (PV) significantly improves diagnostic information in full-field digital mammography (FFDM) compared to Tissue Equalization (TE). PV is particularly effective for detecting malignancy in dense breasts.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Full-field digital mammography (FFDM) is a key tool for breast cancer screening.
- Post-processing software aims to enhance image quality and diagnostic accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic performance of two GE Senographe DS post-processing methods: Tissue Equalization (TE) and Premium View (PV).
- To evaluate their effectiveness in full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of FFDM images from 101 women (mean age 47).
- Three blinded radiologists assessed images using objective criteria for lesion characteristics and overall diagnostic impression.
- Statistical analysis using Wilcoxon signed rank test for between-group comparisons.
Main Results:
- Premium View (PV) received significantly better overall reader impressions compared to Tissue Equalization (TE) (p<0.05).
- PV demonstrated superior performance in diagnostic information endpoints.
- PV was more sensitive in detecting malignant lesions in dense breasts than benign lesions or malignancies in non-dense breasts (p<0.01).
Conclusions:
- Premium View (PV) offers markedly better diagnostic information in FFDM than Tissue Equalization (TE).
- PV is especially beneficial for identifying malignancy in dense breast tissue.
