Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026
Establishment and Evaluation of a Risk Prediction Model for Pathological Escalation of Gastric Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Published on: February 16, 2024
Differentiation between malignant and benign gastric ulcers: CT virtual gastroscopy versus optical gastroendoscopy
Chiao-Yun Chen1, Yu-Ting Kuo, Chien-Hung Lee
1Department of Medical Imaging, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, No. 100 Tz-You First Road, Kaohsiung City, 807 Taiwan.
Purpose:
To retrospectively compare computed tomographic virtual gastroscopy (VG) and conventional optical gastroendoscopy for the differentiation of malignant and benign gastric ulcers.
Materials And Methods:
The institutional review board approved this study and confirmed that informed consent was not required. Gastric ulcers in 115 patients (mean age, 64.7 years; range, 31-86 years; 61 men, 54 women) were evaluated by using endoscopy and VG. Ulcer shape, base, and margin and periulcer folds were evaluated by two independent reviewers. Malignant gastric ulcers were identified by irregular, angulated, or geographic shape; uneven base; irregular or asymmetric edges; and disrupted or moth-eaten appearance of periulcer folds near the crater edge and/or clubbed or fused folds. Benign gastric ulcers were identified by smooth and regular shapes, even bases, clearly demarcated and regular edges, and folds that tapered and converged toward the ulcer. The performance of VG and endoscopy for the diagnosis of benign and malignant gastric ulcers was evaluated by using histopathologic results as the reference standard. The McNemar test was used to compare VG and endoscopic data. A P value less than .05 was considered to indicate a significant difference.
Results:
At histopathologic examination, 39 gastric ulcers were benign, while 76 were malignant. VG and endoscopy had sensitivities of 92.1% (70 of 76) and 88.2% (67 of 76), respectively, for overall diagnosis of malignant gastric ulcers, and specificities of 91.9% (34 of 37) and 89.5% (34 of 38), respectively, for overall diagnosis of malignant gastric ulcers. Endoscopy was more sensitive in depicting malignancy according to ulcer base (85.5% [65 of 76] vs 68.4% [52 of 76]) (P = .034), and VG was more specific in depicting malignancy according to ulcer margin (78.4% [29 of 37] vs 63.2% [24 of 38]) (P = .034).
Conclusion:
VG and endoscopy were almost equally useful in distinguishing between malignant and benign gastric ulcers.
Supplemental Material:
http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/2522081249/DC1.
Related Concept Videos
01:26Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and solid...
01:28Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
01:29Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
01:25Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
01:26Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
01:25Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease