Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Evaluation of Coronary Flow Reserve After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Rats
Published on: June 28, 2019
Endothelial and non-endothelial coronary blood flow reserve and left ventricular dysfunction in systemic hypertension
Aloísio Marchi Rocha1, Vera Maria Cury Salemi, Pedro Alves Lemos Neto
1Heart Institute, Hospital das Clínicas, da Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Insights
Hypertensive cardiac disease did not impair coronary blood flow reserve differently between patients with normal and reduced left ventricular systolic function. Both endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasodilation responses were similar across groups, suggesting preserved coronary vasoreactivity.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Physiology
- Hypertension Research
Background:
- Coronary blood flow reserve reduction is implicated in the progression of left ventricular hypertrophy to dysfunction.
- Understanding vasoreactivity in hypertensive heart disease is crucial for managing cardiac outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impairment of endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent coronary blood flow reserve in hypertensive patients.
- To assess the association between coronary blood flow reserve and hypertensive cardiac disease, specifically left ventricular systolic function.
Main Methods:
- Eighteen hypertensive patients were divided into two groups based on left ventricular fractional shortening (FS).
- Intracoronary acetylcholine and adenosine were administered to assess endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent coronary blood flow reserve.
- Coronary blood flow, coronary vascular resistance, and vasoreactivity were measured.
Main Results:
- Baseline coronary blood flow was similar between groups with normal (FS >=0.25) and reduced (FS <0.25) left ventricular systolic function.
- Both endothelium-dependent (acetylcholine) and endothelium-independent (adenosine) coronary blood flow reserve were similar in both groups.
- Peak acetylcholine/peak adenosine coronary blood flow response and minimal coronary vascular resistance were also comparable between groups.
Conclusions:
- Hypertensive patients with normal or decreased left ventricular systolic function exhibit similar endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent coronary blood flow reserve.
- Vasodilator administration via acetylcholine and adenosine showed comparable effects on coronary blood flow reserve in these patient groups.
- Casual diastolic blood pressure and end-systolic left ventricular stress were independently associated with fractional shortening.
Objectives:
We evaluated the impairment of endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent coronary blood flow reserve after administration of intracoronary acetylcholine and adenosine, and its association with hypertensive cardiac disease.
Introduction:
Coronary blood flow reserve reduction has been proposed as a mechanism for the progression of compensated left ventricular hypertrophy to ventricular dysfunction.
Methods:
Eighteen hypertensive patients with normal epicardial coronary arteries on angiography were divided into two groups according to left ventricular fractional shortening (FS). Group 1 (FS > or =0.25): n=8, FS=0.29 +/- 0.03; Group 2 (FS <0.25): n=10, FS= 0.17 +/- 0.03.
Results:
Baseline coronary blood flow was similar in both groups (Group 1: 80.15 +/- 26.41 mL/min, Group 2: 100.09 +/- 21.51 mL/min, p=NS). In response to adenosine, coronary blood flow increased to 265.1 +/- 100.2 mL/min in Group 1 and to 300.8 +/- 113.6 mL/min (p <0.05) in Group 2. Endothelium-independent coronary blood flow reserve was similar in both groups (Group 1: 3.31 +/- 0.68 and Group 2: 2.97 +/- 0.80, p=NS). In response to acetylcholine, coronary blood flow increased to 156.08 +/- 36.79 mL/min in Group 1 and to 177.8 +/- 83.6 mL/min in Group 2 (p <0.05). Endothelium-dependent coronary blood flow reserve was similar in the two groups (Group 1: 2.08 +/- 0.74 and group Group 2: 1.76 +/- 0.61, p=NS). Peak acetylcholine/peak adenosine coronary blood flow response (Group 1: 0.65 +/- 0.27 and Group 2: 0.60 +/- 0.17) and minimal coronary vascular resistance (Group 1: 0.48 +/- 0.21 mmHg/mL/min and Group 2: 0.34 +/- 0.12 mmHg/mL/min) were similar in both groups (p= NS). Casual diastolic blood pressure and end-systolic left ventricular stress were independently associated with FS.
Conclusions:
In our hypertensive patients, endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent coronary blood flow reserve vasodilator administrations had similar effects in patients with either normal or decreased left ventricular systolic function.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Vascular Resistance
The primary determinants of vascular resistance are vessel diameter, blood viscosity, and vessel length. Among these, vessel diameter plays the most significant role due to the fourth power relationship described by...
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Pathophysiology of Cardiac Performance
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
