Related Experiment Videos
Implications of new diabetes treatment trials: should current clinical practice be altered?
Jeffrey D Kravetz1, Daniel G Federman
1VA Connecticut Health Care, 950 Campbell Avenue, West Haven, CT 06516, USA. jeffrey.kravetz@va.gov
Abstract:
Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus are at increased risk for complications related to both microvascular and macrovascular events. Although glycemic control has been shown to lower the risk of microvascular events, the effect of intensive glycemic control on macrovascular outcomes is less clear. Recently, 3 large randomized controlled trials (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes [ACCORD], Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation [ADVANCE], and the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial [VADT]) have been published to assess the effect of intensive glucose-lowering efforts on macrovascular outcomes, including myocardial infarction, stroke, and death. This article highlights the similarities and differences between the 3 trials with an emphasis on their impact on patient care.
Insights
Intensive glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) did not significantly reduce macrovascular events in major trials like ACCORD, ADVANCE, and VADT. These findings emphasize careful consideration of intensive glucose lowering in T2DM patients.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients face elevated risks for microvascular and macrovascular complications.
- While glycemic control benefits microvascular outcomes, its impact on macrovascular events remains debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare three major randomized controlled trials (ACCORD, ADVANCE, VADT) assessing intensive glucose-lowering strategies in T2DM.
- To analyze the effects of intensive glycemic control on macrovascular outcomes, including myocardial infarction, stroke, and death.
Main Methods:
- Review and comparison of the methodologies, patient populations, and interventions of the ACCORD, ADVANCE, and VADT trials.
- Analysis of reported outcomes related to macrovascular events and mortality across the three studies.
Main Results:
- Intensive glycemic control did not consistently demonstrate a significant reduction in major macrovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, death) across the trials.
- Some trials showed potential increases in adverse events with intensive glucose lowering, necessitating careful risk-benefit assessment.
Conclusions:
- Intensive glucose-lowering strategies in T2DM, as evaluated in ACCORD, ADVANCE, and VADT, do not offer clear macrovascular benefits and may carry risks.
- Patient care decisions regarding intensive glycemic control should consider individual risk factors and potential adverse effects.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Type II Diabetes Mellitus III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones