Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Drug Regulation01:25

Drug Regulation

Drug regulation encompasses the management of drug usage by evaluating its safety and efficacy through assessments conducted by regulatory authorities. Regrettably, the history of drug regulation is marred by several catastrophic events. One such incident is the Elixir Sulfanilamide tragedy, in which the toxic compound diethyl glycol was included in a sweet-tasting medication, leading to numerous fatalities. This event prompted the enactment of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act in 1938. Under...
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.
Investigation of Disease Outbreaks01:23

Investigation of Disease Outbreaks

Multistate foodborne outbreaks pose significant public health risks and require meticulous investigation to identify sources and implement control measures. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) utilizes a dynamic seven-step process for these investigations, integrating data from laboratories, interviews, and environmental assessments to protect public health.Outbreak Detection: The detection of multistate outbreaks typically begins with PulseNet, the CDC's national laboratory...
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null hypothesis and 'fail to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Xenotransplantation: Injustice, Harm, and Alternatives for Addressing the Organ Crisis.

The Hastings Center report·2025
Same author

Individual difference factors that predict evaluations and acceptance of authorized concealment for the reduction of nocebo side effects.

Patient education and counseling·2025
Same author

Clinical trials are not the solution to inequities in cancer care.

Gynecologic oncology·2025
Same author

Are Patients With Cancer Best Managed in a Clinical Trial?

JAMA·2024
Same author

The Use of Authorized Concealment to Minimize Nocebo Side Effects: A Survey of US Public Attitudes.

Psychotherapy and psychosomatics·2023
Same author

Ethical Outreach for Rural Cancer Care in the United States: Balancing Access With Optimal Clinical Outcomes.

JCO oncology practice·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow
09:04

Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow

Published on: April 18, 2019

When scientists deceive: applying the federal regulations.

Collin C O'Neil1, Franklin G Miller

  • 1Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, USA.

The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics : a Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics
|June 5, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Deceptive research methods, while valuable for studying attitudes, require Institutional Review Board approval via waivers of informed consent. A study showed price influenced wine enjoyment, demonstrating deception

More Related Videos

Deploying Community Scientists to Conduct Nondestructive Genetic Sampling of Rare Butterfly Populations
07:17

Deploying Community Scientists to Conduct Nondestructive Genetic Sampling of Rare Butterfly Populations

Published on: October 28, 2022

Handling and Tagging Techniques for Implanting Juvenile American Shad with a New Acoustic Microtransmitter
09:01

Handling and Tagging Techniques for Implanting Juvenile American Shad with a New Acoustic Microtransmitter

Published on: June 14, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow
09:04

Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow

Published on: April 18, 2019

Deploying Community Scientists to Conduct Nondestructive Genetic Sampling of Rare Butterfly Populations
07:17

Deploying Community Scientists to Conduct Nondestructive Genetic Sampling of Rare Butterfly Populations

Published on: October 28, 2022

Handling and Tagging Techniques for Implanting Juvenile American Shad with a New Acoustic Microtransmitter
09:01

Handling and Tagging Techniques for Implanting Juvenile American Shad with a New Acoustic Microtransmitter

Published on: June 14, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Behavioral Science
  • Research Ethics

Background:

  • Deception is a common research tool for attitude and behavior studies.
  • U.S. federal regulations mandate informed consent for research.
  • Deceptive studies must meet specific criteria for waivers of informed consent.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the regulatory conditions for waiving informed consent in deceptive studies.
  • To apply these conditions to a specific case of deceptive research.

Main Methods:

  • Review of U.S. federal regulations on informed consent and waivers.
  • Application of waiver conditions to a study using deception.
  • Analysis of a wine-tasting study where price influenced perceived enjoyment.

Main Results:

  • Deceptive studies must satisfy four specific regulatory conditions for approval.
  • The wine-tasting study met the criteria for a waiver of informed consent.
  • Participants rated wine more favorably when they believed it was more expensive.

Conclusions:

  • Waivers of informed consent are crucial for conducting valuable deceptive research.
  • Ethical guidelines can accommodate methodologically sound deception.
  • Perceived value, influenced by factors like price, significantly impacts subjective experiences.