Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Ending Relationships

Ending Relationships

The dissolution of intimate relationships presents complex emotional and psychological challenges, particularly when emotional bonds are strong, the relationship is long-standing, and perceived alternatives are limited. This distress often intensifies in romantic breakups, where the initiator may experience greater turmoil than the rejected partner. Contributing factors include residual attachment, guilt over causing pain, and uncertainty about how to manage the situation. The stress is further...

Non-Verbal Cues

Non-Verbal Cues

Non-verbal communication extends beyond gestures and facial expressions to include vocal elements known as paralanguage. Paralanguage consists of non-verbal vocal cues such as pitch, loudness, speech rate, pauses, and non-verbal vocalizations like laughter, sighs, and moans. These elements not only accompany speech but also provide critical emotional and contextual information.The Role of Paralanguage in CommunicationParalanguage adds depth to spoken language by conveying emotions and...

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role of...

Relationship Formation

Relationship Formation

What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...

Factors Influencing Attraction IV: Reciprocity

Factors Influencing Attraction IV: Reciprocity

Reciprocity in attraction is fundamental to social and romantic relationships, shaping how individuals form and maintain connections. The psychological principle underlying this phenomenon is that people tend to like those who express liking toward them. Balance theory supports this tendency, suggesting that mutual attraction fosters psychological harmony, whereas one-sided affection leads to discomfort and cognitive dissonance.The Psychological Mechanisms Behind ReciprocityWhen individuals...

Jealousy in Romantic Relationships

Jealousy in Romantic Relationships

Jealousy is an instinctive yet socially complex emotion that arises when a close relationship is threatened. Its origins lie in both biological imperatives and sociocultural conditioning, making it a multifaceted psychological construct. Although universally experienced, the triggers and expressions of jealousy vary notably between individuals, especially across genders, due to evolutionary pressures and cultural influences.Gender Differences and Evolutionary TheoryEvolutionary theory explains...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Implicit versus explicit ambivalence: differential association with depressive and anxiety symptoms and guilt in family caregivers of people with dementia.

Aging & mental health·2026

Same author

Testing the robustness of daily associations of affect with alcohol and cannabis use.

Journal of psychopathology and clinical science·2026

Same author

Alcohol and cannabis use predicted by affect-urgency interactions in everyday life.

Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026

Same author

Within-day associations between affect and intentions to drink alcohol in adolescents and young adults: A registered report.

Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors·2025

Same author

A manifesto for a globally diverse, equitable, and inclusive open science.

Communications psychology·2025

Same author

Out of sight but in mind: Experimentally activating partner representations in daily life buffers against common stressors.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 22, 2026

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

Neural responses to partner rejection cues.

Vivian Zayas¹, Yuichi Shoda, Walter Mischel

¹Department of Psychology, Cornell University, 240 Uris Hall, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA. vz29@cornell.edu

Psychological Science

|June 5, 2009

Summary

The brain processes partner rejection cues automatically within 300 milliseconds. Adult attachment styles, particularly high anxiety, influence these early neural responses to rejection.

More Related Videos

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials

Published on: November 15, 2014

Humor or Rationality? The Neural Mechanisms of How Agent Type and Language Style Influence Satisfaction with Ride-Hailing Service Failure Recovery

Humor or Rationality? The Neural Mechanisms of How Agent Type and Language Style Influence Satisfaction with Ride-Hailing Service Failure Recovery

Published on: March 13, 2026

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 22, 2026

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials

Published on: November 15, 2014

Humor or Rationality? The Neural Mechanisms of How Agent Type and Language Style Influence Satisfaction with Ride-Hailing Service Failure Recovery

Humor or Rationality? The Neural Mechanisms of How Agent Type and Language Style Influence Satisfaction with Ride-Hailing Service Failure Recovery

Published on: March 13, 2026

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Social Psychology
Cognitive Science

Background:

Limited understanding of early neural processing of partner rejection cues.
Event-related potentials (ERPs) provide insights into rapid cognitive processes.
The N400 component reflects semantic processing and is sensitive to contextual incongruity.

Purpose of the Study:

Investigate early automatic neural responses to partner rejection cues.
Examine the role of the N400 ERP component in processing rejection vs. acceptance.
Determine if adult attachment styles modulate these neural responses.

Main Methods:

Utilized event-related potentials (ERPs) to measure neural activity.
Employed attachment-related and nonattachment-related priming contexts.
Presented rejection-related and acceptance-related words as targets.
Analyzed N400 amplitudes in response to target words.

Main Results:

Rejection words elicited greater N400 amplitudes than acceptance words in attachment-related contexts.
Differential brain responses to rejection vs. acceptance occurred within 300 ms, independent of target valence.
High anxiety and low avoidance attachment styles were associated with heightened N400 responses to rejection cues.

Conclusions:

The brain exhibits rapid, automatic neural differentiation between partner rejection and acceptance cues.
Early neurophysiological responses to rejection are modulated by individual differences in adult attachment.
Findings highlight the sensitivity of early semantic processing to social-rejection information.