Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gestalt Principles of Perception01:21

Gestalt Principles of Perception

Gestalt principles provide a framework for understanding how humans perceive objects as unified wholes within their context. These principles are essential in explaining the cognitive processes that make sense of complex visual stimuli by organizing them into coherent groups. One fundamental principle is proximity, which posits that objects located close to each other are perceived as a collective group. For instance, when dots are positioned near one another, the visual system interprets them...
Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
Factors Affecting Perception01:25

Factors Affecting Perception

Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System01:11

Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System

The somatosensory system is the central and peripheral nervous system component that senses and processes touch, pressure, pain, temperature, and body position or proprioception. The process of sensation takes place at three levels:
The receptor level:
The receptor level is the first stage of sensation. It involves the detection of a stimulus by specialized sensory receptors. The stimulus must arrive within the receptor's receptive field. Next, the receptor converts the energy of the stimulus...
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A longitudinal investigation of school absenteeism and mental health challenges among Canadian children and youth in the COVID-19 context.

Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry·2025
Same author

Inhibitory Control, Conduct Problems, and Callous Unemotional Traits in Children with ADHD and Typically Developing Children.

Developmental neuropsychology·2022
Same author

Exploring Explicit Learning Strategies: A Dissociative Framework for Research.

New ideas in psychology·2021
Same author

A Dissociative Framework for Understanding Same-Different Conceptualization.

Current opinion in behavioral sciences·2021
Same author

Conceptual anchoring dissociates implicit and explicit category learning.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2021
Same author

Launch! Self-agency as a discriminative cue for humans (Homo sapiens) and monkeys (Macaca Mulatta).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2021
Same journal

Rank and payoff biases influence subject choices in a foraging task among sanctuary chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Animal cognition·2026
Same journal

Buzzed but not elated? Effect of ethanol on cognitive judgement bias in honeybees.

Animal cognition·2026
Same journal

Dogs tuned to conspecific vocalizations: behavioral evidence for a voice processing preference.

Animal cognition·2026
Same journal

Variation in song structure does not predict associative learning performance in zebra finches (Taeniopygia castanotis) raised under controlled cultural conditions.

Animal cognition·2026
Same journal

Executive functioning in wild guppies: investigating the impact of a pharmaceutical pollutant.

Animal cognition·2026
Same journal

Performance of sheep and goats in a delay of gratification task.

Animal cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
05:39

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

The comparative psychophysics of complex shape perception.

J David Smith1, Joshua S Redford, Sarah M Haas

  • 1Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA. psysmith@buffalo.edu

Animal Cognition
|June 5, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Humans and monkeys share similar shape perception and comparison processes. Both species exhibit comparable psychological space organization and distance metrics in judging shape similarity, revealing common cognitive principles.

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
05:39

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Comparative psychology
  • Cognitive science
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Understanding the fundamental principles of shape perception and categorization is crucial for cognitive science.
  • Comparative studies offer insights into conserved cognitive mechanisms across species.
  • Previous research has explored shape perception, but direct comparisons of complex shape judgments between humans and non-human primates are limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and compare the complex shape perception and comparison abilities of humans and monkeys.
  • To determine if common organizational principles exist in the psychological space of shape perception for both species.
  • To identify shared metrics of psychological distance in shape similarity judgments.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a Same-Different paradigm for both human and monkey participants.
  • Presented pairs of shapes varying around a common prototype.
  • Analyzed similarity gradients based on shape variations within a defined psychological space.

Main Results:

  • Both humans and monkeys demonstrated steep similarity gradients radiating from the center of psychological space.
  • Conversely, both species showed flat similarity gradients when moving from the periphery towards the center.
  • The peripheral shape in a pair was found to significantly influence the perceived similarity strength.

Conclusions:

  • Humans and monkeys share fundamental principles in shape perception and comparison.
  • The organization of psychological space and the application of psychological distance metrics are conserved across these species.
  • These findings have significant implications for the comparative study of perception and categorization, suggesting shared evolutionary roots for these cognitive functions.