Efficacy of ShotBlocker in reducing pediatric pain associated with intramuscular injections

Lisa A Drago1, Sabina B Singh, April Douglass-Bright

  • 1Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Medical School at Camden, NJ 08103, USA. drago-l@cooperhealth.edu

Insights

ShotBlocker effectively reduced pain perception during intramuscular injections in children, as reported by nurses and caregivers. However, children

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Pain Management
  • Medical Device Efficacy
  • Clinical Trial Research

Background:

  • Intramuscular (IM) injections are a common source of acute pain in pediatric patients.
  • Effective pain reduction strategies are crucial for improving patient experience and adherence to treatment.
  • The ShotBlocker device is designed to mitigate pain associated with needle-based procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of the ShotBlocker device in reducing pain experienced by children during IM injections.
  • To compare pain scores between children using ShotBlocker and a control group receiving no intervention.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted with 165 children aged 2 months to 17 years.
  • Participants were randomized to either the ShotBlocker group or a no-intervention control group.
  • Pain was assessed using Likert-type scales by nurses and caregivers, and the Baker Wong Faces scale for older children.

Main Results:

  • Nurses reported significantly lower pain scores in the ShotBlocker group (1.8) compared to the no-intervention group (2.6; P < .001).
  • Caregivers also reported lower pain scores with ShotBlocker use (2.1 vs 2.6; P = .04).
  • No significant difference in pain was reported by children aged 36 months and older, though a trend emerged in older children (≥72 months).

Conclusions:

  • Nurses and caregivers perceived ShotBlocker as effective in reducing pediatric pain during IM injections.
  • The device demonstrated ease of use with low reported difficulty by nurses.
  • Self-reported pain by children did not show significant differences, suggesting potential variations in pain perception reporting across different assessment methods.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacokinetics01:11

Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacokinetics

All neuromuscular blocking agents are injected intravenously because they are poorly absorbed from the GI tract. Rapid onset is achieved with intravenous administration, although absorption is also adequate from an intramuscular injection. Since these agents are highly ionized, they do not readily penetrate cell membranes or cross the blood-brain barrier.
Instead, they are transported by the blood to different tissues. Muscles with a greater blood supply (arteries) and blood flow receive more...
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics01:19

Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics

Depolarizing blockers are administered through intravenous injection. Succinylcholine is the most common choice of depolarizing blockers in emergency clinical practices. Although they have a rapid onset, they readily diffuse away from the motor end plate into the extracellular fluid. They are metabolized by enzymes such as liver butyrylcholinesterase and plasma pseudocholinesterases. This produces a short duration of action, typically 5-10 minutes long, unlike nondepolarizing blockers, which...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia01:16

Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia

Intravenous regional anesthesia or the Bier block technique is used to anesthetize a specific limb or extremity. It uses exsanguinated or blood-drained vessels to transport local anesthetics or LAs to the peripheral nerve trunks. Lidocaine without vasoconstrictors like epinephrine is most commonly used for this technique. Other drugs used are prilocaine, ropivacaine, and chloroprocaine. Bupivacaine is not recommended for this technique due to its high cardiac toxicity.
One of the advantages of...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacological Actions01:27

Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacological Actions

Nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockers prevent the membrane depolarization of muscle cells and inhibit muscle contraction. These are usually administered with anesthetics to achieve complete muscle relaxation. Upon administration, these drugs first block the small, rapidly contracting muscles of the face and hands, followed by the larger muscles of the trunk and the intercostal muscles. The diaphragm is the last muscle to be affected.
Although all competitive neuromuscular blockers are designed...
Drug Delivery: Parenteral Route01:29

Drug Delivery: Parenteral Route

The parenteral route is a critical method of drug administration. It delivers compounds directly into the systemic circulation and bypasses the gastrointestinal tract. This approach is particularly advantageous for drugs that exhibit poor absorption or instability when administered orally.
There are three primary parenteral routes: intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), and subcutaneous (SC). The IV route introduces the drug directly into the bloodstream, ensuring immediate action. The IM route...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Mechanism of Action01:17

Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Mechanism of Action

Nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockers induce paralysis by competitively blocking nicotinic acetylcholine receptors at the muscle end plate. Examples include pancuronium, mivacurium, vecuronium, and rocuronium. These quaternary ammonium derivatives are administered intravenously, are poorly absorbed, and are excreted via the kidneys.
Competitive antagonists prevent acetylcholine from binding to its receptor, inhibiting membrane depolarization. Without conformational changes or intrinsic...