Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm
Published on: April 28, 2016
Development of preparatory activity indexed by the contingent negative variation in children
Angélica B Flores1, Marcia R Digiacomo, Susana Meneres
1Human Psychobiology Lab, Departamento de Psicología Experimental, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Sevilla, c/Camilo José Cela s/n, Seville, Spain. angelicafloresb@gmail.com
Insights
Children
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Developmental Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
Background:
- Investigating age-related differences in cognitive processes is crucial for understanding developmental trajectories.
- The Posner paradigm is a well-established tool for examining attention and preparation.
- Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) provides insights into anticipatory brain activity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare age-related effects on task-specific preparatory activation using a spatial cue.
- To analyze behavioral responses and contingent negative variation (CNV) between children and young adults.
- To explore developmental differences in motor and sensory preparation.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the central cue Posner's paradigm with electroencephalography (EEG).
- Recorded EEG from 20 scalp sites (International 10-20 system).
- Analyzed early and late CNV components during a waiting period between warning and imperative stimuli.
Main Results:
- Young adults exhibited contralateral cortical activation for motor preparation, unlike children.
- Both age groups showed contralateral sensory area activation.
- Children displayed a unique positive parietal component during the CNV period.
Conclusions:
- Suggests that the motor preparation system is less mature in children compared to young adults.
- Indicates that children may employ different strategies and brain regions for preparation.
- Highlights developmental disparities between sensory and motor preparatory systems.
Objectives:
The present study investigated the effect of age on task-specific preparatory activation induced by a spatial cue using the central cue Posner's paradigm. The behavioral responses and the contingent negative variation (CNV) generated between S1 (the warning stimulus) and S2 (the imperative stimulus) were compared between 16 healthy children (8-13 years old) and 17 healthy young adults (18-23 years old).
Methods:
The EEG was recorded from 20 scalp sites of the International 10-20 system. The complete trial period included a central directional cue that was on for 300 ms and an attentive waiting period lasting 1360 ms. Finally, a peripheral target appeared, subtending a visual angle of 4.56 degrees and situated 2.28 degrees eccentrically in the horizontal meridian. The early and late components of the CNV appearing in the period between cue and target were analyzed.
Results:
The CNV of children showed no contralateral cortical activation related to motor preparation. However, the young adults showed contralateral activation to the cue over motor areas. Both children and young adults showed cortical activation in posterior sensory areas, displaying a pattern of activation contralateral to the cue. Also, a positive parietal component appeared in children during the CNV period.
Conclusions:
These results suggest that the motor preparation system in children is less mature than the sensory preparatory system. The children may have used strategies and brain areas different from those of the young adults to prepare for stimuli and responses.
More Related Videos
10:11Portable Intermodal Preferential Looking (IPL): Investigating Language Comprehension in Typically Developing Toddlers and Young Children with Autism
Published on: December 14, 2012
08:22Measuring Cardiac Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) Activity in Toddlers - Resting and Developmental Challenges
Published on: February 25, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development
Exploration...
The Nativist Approach
Information Processing Approach
Language Development
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
Stella Chess...
Piaget's Stage 2 of Cognitive Development