Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Assessing Activity-based Anorexia in Mice
Published on: May 14, 2018
Characterizing the effects of 5-HT(2C) receptor ligands on motor activity and feeding behaviour in 5-HT(2C) receptor
Paul J Fletcher1, Maria Tampakeras, Judy Sinyard
1Section of Biopsychology, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5T 1R8. paul_fletcher@camh.net
Abstract:
5-HT(2C) receptor agonists have considerable therapeutic potential, however there is little in vivo data to compare the potency and selectivity of 5-HT(2C) receptor agonists. Since 5-HT(2C) receptor agonists reduce locomotor activity and food intake, changes in these drug-induced behaviours in 5-HT(2C) receptor knockout mice could provide a means to examine receptor selectivity in-vivo. Initially this study compared older 5-HT(2C) agonists mCPP and MK212, to newer, apparently more selective compounds: Ro 60-0175, WAY161503, CP809,101 and lorcaserin (APD356) on motor activity in wild-type, and 5-HT(2C) receptor knockout mice. Two 5-HT(2C) receptor antagonists SB242084 and SDZ SER 082 were also examined. mCPP did not significantly alter activity in wild-type mice, but enhanced activity in knockout animals. MK212 (3 and 10 mg/kg) and Ro 60-0175 (1 and 3 mg/kg) reduced activity in wild-type but not knockout animals. At 10 mg/kg, Ro 60-0175 reduced activity in knockout animals, suggesting loss of 5-HT(2C) receptor selectivity. CP809,101 and lorcaserin reduced activity in wild-type but not knockout mice. In subsequent feeding studies, Ro 60-0175 and lorcaserin reduced food intake in wild-type animals only. Selectivity of effect for mCPP was marginal. The antagonist SB242084 increased activity in wild-type animals but not in knockout mice; SB242084 did not alter feeding in either genotype. SDZ SER 082 reduced activity in both genotypes implying poor selectivity for 5-HT(2C) receptors. The data demonstrate that studying food intake, and particularly motor behaviour, in the 5-HT(2C) receptor knockout mouse is a useful and relatively simple approach for screening 5-HT(2C) receptor ligands in vivo.
Insights
This study used 5-HT(2C) receptor knockout mice to evaluate the in vivo selectivity of various 5-HT(2C) receptor agonists and antagonists. Motor activity and food intake changes in knockout mice effectively screened these compounds, validating the approach.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology
- Neuroscience
- Genetics
Background:
- 5-HT(2C) receptor agonists show therapeutic promise but require in vivo selectivity data.
- Locomotor activity and food intake are known behavioral effects of 5-HT(2C) receptor agonists.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the in vivo potency and selectivity of various 5-HT(2C) receptor agonists and antagonists.
- To establish the utility of 5-HT(2C) receptor knockout mice for screening these ligands.
Main Methods:
- Compared agonists (mCPP, MK212, Ro 60-0175, WAY161503, CP809,101, lorcaserin) and antagonists (SB242084, SDZ SER 082) in wild-type and 5-HT(2C) receptor knockout mice.
- Assessed effects on locomotor activity and food intake.
Main Results:
- Agonists Ro 60-0175, CP809,101, and lorcaserin reduced activity and food intake in wild-type but not knockout mice, indicating 5-HT(2C) receptor selectivity.
- Higher dose of Ro 60-0175 showed reduced selectivity in knockout mice.
- Antagonist SB242084 increased activity in wild-type mice only, while SDZ SER 082 showed poor selectivity.
Conclusions:
- Motor behavior and food intake studies in 5-HT(2C) receptor knockout mice provide a simple and effective in vivo method for screening 5-HT(2C) receptor ligands.
- This approach aids in determining the selectivity of novel therapeutic compounds targeting the 5-HT(2C) receptor.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Serotonin Receptor Agonists
Regulation of Food Intake
