Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A minimal physiological model of perceptual suppression and breakthrough in visual rivalry.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Evolution of the Wilson-Cowan equations.

Biological cybernetics·2021
Same author

Hyperchaos in Wilson-Cowan oscillator circuits.

Journal of neurophysiology·2019
Same author

Voluntary Generation of Hyperchaotic Visuo-Motor Patterns.

Scientific reports·2019
Same author

Binocular contrast, stereopsis, and rivalry: Toward a dynamical synthesis.

Vision research·2017
Same author

Face perception develops similarly across viewpoint in children and adolescents with and without autism spectrum disorder.

Journal of vision·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 22, 2026

The Measurement and Treatment of Suppression in Amblyopia
08:34

The Measurement and Treatment of Suppression in Amblyopia

Published on: December 14, 2012

Stimulus specificity in spatially-extended interocular suppression.

David F Nichols1, Hugh R Wilson

  • 1Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Ont., Canada M3J 1P3. dnichols@roanoke.edu

Vision Research
|June 9, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Binocular rivalry shows that visual perception alternates. Target luminance patterns and orientation, especially grating orientation, significantly influence suppression susceptibility during rivalry.

More Related Videos

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

Monocular Visual Deprivation and Ocular Dominance Plasticity Measurement in the Mouse Primary Visual Cortex
08:42

Monocular Visual Deprivation and Ocular Dominance Plasticity Measurement in the Mouse Primary Visual Cortex

Published on: February 8, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 22, 2026

The Measurement and Treatment of Suppression in Amblyopia
08:34

The Measurement and Treatment of Suppression in Amblyopia

Published on: December 14, 2012

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

Monocular Visual Deprivation and Ocular Dominance Plasticity Measurement in the Mouse Primary Visual Cortex
08:42

Monocular Visual Deprivation and Ocular Dominance Plasticity Measurement in the Mouse Primary Visual Cortex

Published on: February 8, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Vision Science
  • Perceptual Psychology

Background:

  • Binocular rivalry involves alternating perceptions of disparate images presented to each eye.
  • Interocular interactions can occur even with non-overlapping, spatially proximate stimuli, suggesting spatial spread.
  • Understanding factors influencing suppression is key to understanding binocular vision.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how target luminance patterns and orientation affect suppression susceptibility in binocular rivalry.
  • To explore the spatial spread of interocular interactions and its modulation by stimulus features.
  • To determine if suppression mechanisms aid in stereoscopic matching and binocular fusion.

Main Methods:

  • Experiments using binocular rivalry paradigms with varying target luminance patterns and suppressor stimuli.
  • Systematic manipulation of grating orientation in target and suppressor stimuli.
  • Analysis of suppression duration and perceptual alternation rates.
  • Inclusion of spatial gaps between suppressors and targets to assess their impact.

Main Results:

  • Target suppression susceptibility is nonlinearly related to luminance variation perpendicular to the suppressor.
  • Grating orientation strongly affects suppression time; vertical suppressors cause more suppression of horizontal gratings than vertical gratings.
  • Spatial gaps introduce figural information that alters suppression susceptibility, complicating spatial interaction measurements.
  • Suppression is influenced by stimulus orientation and spatial configuration.

Conclusions:

  • Visual suppression in binocular rivalry is selective, targeting information that could hinder stereoscopic matching.
  • Stimulus features like luminance patterns and orientation play a crucial role in modulating suppression.
  • Spatial interactions in binocular vision are complex and influenced by figural properties beyond simple proximity.
  • These findings support the role of suppression in facilitating accurate binocular fusion.