Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Ultrasonography of the Adult Male Urinary Tract for Urinary Functional Testing
Published on: August 14, 2019
The comparative pressure-flow plot properties of radiological bladder neck and prostatic obstruction
Sanjin Idriz1, Samuel Bishara, Alex Kirkham
1Department of Surgery, University College Hospital, London, UK.
Urodynamic assessment reveals distinct biomechanical differences in pressure/flow data between bladder neck and prostatic obstruction in men. This method can differentiate these conditions with moderate accuracy, aiding in understanding male outflow obstruction.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Male lower urinary tract symptoms are often caused by bladder outlet obstruction.
- Distinguishing between bladder neck and prostatic obstruction is crucial for effective management.
- Urodynamic assessment provides pressure/flow data, while micturating cystourethrograms (MCUG) offer imaging insights.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if pressure/flow data differ significantly between bladder neck and prostatic obstruction.
- To determine if these differences enhance understanding of male outflow obstruction pathophysiology.
- To evaluate the utility of MCUG in classifying obstruction types for urodynamic analysis.
Main Methods:
- Analyzed pressure/flow data from 71 men with radiologically classified bladder neck (42) or prostatic (29) obstruction.
- Recorded key urodynamic variables: detrusor pressure at voiding initiation, end of voiding, and maximum flow rate (Qmax).
- Calculated the urethral resistance relation (URR) gradient (DeltaP(det)/DeltaQ) from pressure-flow plots.
Main Results:
- Significant differences were found in detrusor pressure at voiding initiation (P(det.open)), end of voiding (P(det.close)), and at maximum flow rate (P(det.)Q(max)) between the two obstruction groups.
- Maximum flow rate (Qmax) and URR gradient (DeltaP(det)/DeltaQ) did not significantly distinguish between the groups.
- A best-fit model achieved an area under the receiver operator curve of 0.72 for discriminating between MCUG-defined obstruction types.
Conclusions:
- Urodynamic assessment identified coherent biomechanical differences between bladder neck and prostatic obstruction.
- The study demonstrated the potential of urodynamics to distinguish between these obstruction types with moderate accuracy.
- Findings support the integration of imaging and urodynamic data for a comprehensive understanding of male outflow obstruction.
Related Concept Videos
Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
Pressure Relationships in Thoracic Cavity
Breathing Mechanisms
Both intra-alveolar and intrapleural pressures rely on specific lung properties. The ability to breathe—allowing air to enter the lungs during...
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Bernoulli's Equation: Problem Solving
The first step is to compute the cross-sectional areas of the pipe and the Venturi throat to analyze the pressure difference indicated by the pressure gauge. Next, the continuity equation is...

