Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pollination and Flower Structure02:40

Pollination and Flower Structure

Flowers are the reproductive, seed-producing structures of angiosperms. Typically, flowers consist of sepals, petals, stamens, and carpels. Sepals and petals are the vegetative flower organs. Stamens and carpels are the reproductive organs.
Epiphytes, Parasites, and Carnivores02:40

Epiphytes, Parasites, and Carnivores

Plants often form mutualistic relationships with soil-dwelling fungi or bacteria to enhance their roots’ nutrient uptake ability. Root-colonizing fungi (e.g., mycorrhizae) increase a plant’s root surface area, which promotes nutrient absorption. While root-colonizing, nitrogen-fixing bacteria (e.g., rhizobia) convert atmospheric nitrogen (N2) into ammonia (NH3), making nitrogen available to plants for various biological functions. For example, nitrogen is essential for the biosynthesis of the...
Osmoregulation in Insects01:47

Osmoregulation in Insects

Malpighian tubules are specialized structures found in the digestive systems of many arthropods, including most insects, that handle excretion and osmoregulation. The tubules are typically arranged in pairs and have a convoluted structure that increases their surface area.
Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.Although predation is commonly associated with carnivory, for...
Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.Positive Frequency-Dependent SelectionIn positive...
Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

OdonTraits Europe. A comprehensive traits dataset for European dragonflies and damselflies.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Cerrado plant traits (CPT): a database of functional traits across vegetation types in a global biodiversity hotspot.

Annals of botany·2026
Same author

France must protect pollinators over pesticides.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Population trends and variability within bird communities are amplified by intense land use.

The Journal of animal ecology·2026
Same author

Common birds have higher abundances in croplands with lower pesticide purchases.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Experimental Evidence for the Desynchronization of Ecosystem Dynamics by Global Change.

Ecology letters·2025
Same journal

Effects of highly pathogenic avian influenza on the behaviour and survival of a colonial breeding seabird.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

A special feature highlighting impactful science from countries and regions underrepresented in Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Religious rituals in the United Kingdom and Brazil are associated with increased social bonding and pain threshold.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Limited evidence that reputation-based partner choice facilitates information sharing in humans.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Phylogenomics resolves the century-old 'Zoraptera problem': Zoraptera as the earliest diverging lineage of Polyneoptera.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Paternal dietary macronutrients affect the seminal vesicle fluid proteome and fetal development: a geometric framework for nutrition study in mice.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Field Experiments of Pollination Ecology: The Case of Lycoris sanguinea var. sanguinea
07:19

Field Experiments of Pollination Ecology: The Case of Lycoris sanguinea var. sanguinea

Published on: November 25, 2016

Are insect pollinators more generalist than insect herbivores?

Colin Fontaine1, Elisa Thébault, Isabelle Dajoz

  • 1NERC Centre for Population Biology, Division of Biology, Imperial College London, , Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, UK. c.fontaine@imperial.ac.uk

Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|June 12, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The type of interaction, whether pollination or herbivory, significantly impacts species generalism in plant-insect communities. Pollinators interact broadly, while herbivores connect with more closely related plants.

More Related Videos

Identification of Metabolically Active Bacteria in the Gut of the Generalist Spodoptera littoralis via DNA Stable Isotope Probing Using 13C-Glucose
12:11

Identification of Metabolically Active Bacteria in the Gut of the Generalist Spodoptera littoralis via DNA Stable Isotope Probing Using 13C-Glucose

Published on: November 13, 2013

In Vitro Rearing of Solitary Bees: A Tool for Assessing Larval Risk Factors
08:50

In Vitro Rearing of Solitary Bees: A Tool for Assessing Larval Risk Factors

Published on: July 16, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Field Experiments of Pollination Ecology: The Case of Lycoris sanguinea var. sanguinea
07:19

Field Experiments of Pollination Ecology: The Case of Lycoris sanguinea var. sanguinea

Published on: November 25, 2016

Identification of Metabolically Active Bacteria in the Gut of the Generalist Spodoptera littoralis via DNA Stable Isotope Probing Using 13C-Glucose
12:11

Identification of Metabolically Active Bacteria in the Gut of the Generalist Spodoptera littoralis via DNA Stable Isotope Probing Using 13C-Glucose

Published on: November 13, 2013

In Vitro Rearing of Solitary Bees: A Tool for Assessing Larval Risk Factors
08:50

In Vitro Rearing of Solitary Bees: A Tool for Assessing Larval Risk Factors

Published on: July 16, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Community Ecology
  • Evolutionary Biology

Background:

  • Generalist species are increasingly recognized for their significant role in community functioning and evolution.
  • The type of interaction (trophic vs. mutualistic) is hypothesized to influence species generalization, but direct comparisons are lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare species generalization levels between plant-pollinator and plant-herbivore interactions.
  • To investigate how interaction type affects various metrics of species generalism, including community distribution and phylogenetic diversity.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 44 plant-insect networks representing pollination and herbivory communities.
  • Comparison of non-quantitative, quantitative, and phylogenetic measures of species generalism.

Main Results:

  • Interaction type significantly impacts species generalism across different measurement types.
  • Pollinators generally interact with a wider and more even range of plant species than herbivores.
  • Herbivores exhibit a stronger tendency to interact with plant species that are phylogenetically closer to each other compared to pollinators.

Conclusions:

  • The type of interaction fundamentally shapes the structure and evolutionary dynamics of ecological communities.
  • Understanding these interaction-specific differences is crucial for comprehending the functioning of multispecies assemblages.