Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)01:23

Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)

Measuring blood pressure is a fundamental skill in healthcare that aids in diagnosing and monitoring hypertension and other cardiovascular conditions. An aneroid sphygmomanometer, commonly used in clinical settings, offers a manual and precise method for blood pressure measurement. The technique for using this instrument involves specific steps that must be carefully executed to ensure accuracy. The following detailed description outlines a two-step technique for assessing blood pressure using...
Assessment of the Mouth01:26

Assessment of the Mouth

A thorough mouth assessment, including inspection and palpation of the lips, gums, tongue, tonsils, uvula, and pharynx, is crucial in detecting potential health issues. Diseases ranging from oral cancer to systemic conditions like diabetes could be identified early through careful oral examination. This article provides a detailed guide on conducting a comprehensive mouth assessment.
Mouth Inspection
The inspection begins with visually examining the mouth for symmetry, color, and size.
Assessment of apical radial pulse01:25

Assessment of apical radial pulse

Apical-Radial (A-R) Pulse Assessment
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)01:15

Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)

This procedural guide systematically measures blood pressure using an oscillometric digital sphygmomanometer, emphasizing accuracy, patient safety, and comfort.
Prepare for the Procedure:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

High-Performance Fe-MoS<sub>2</sub> Electrocatalyst for Efficient Nitrate Reduction to Ammonia: Synergistic Design for Sustainable Ammonia Production.

ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering·2025
Same author

Minimally invasive intraoral proportional condylectomy with a three-dimensionally printed cutting guide.

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2020
Same author

Effect of Flap Design for Enamel Matrix Derivative Application in Intraosseous Defects.

JDR clinical and translational research·2020
Same author

Three-dimensional skeletal changes after early proportional condylectomy for condylar hyperplasia.

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2019
Same author

Thyroid ultrasonography reporting: consensus of Italian Thyroid Association (AIT), Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE), Italian Society of Ultrasonography in Medicine and Biology (SIUMB) and Ultrasound Chapter of Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM).

Journal of endocrinological investigation·2018
Same author

Periodontal education and assessment in the undergraduate dental curriculum-A questionnaire-based survey in European countries.

European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults
08:47

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults

Published on: February 2, 2020

Comparison between two methods for periodontal risk assessment.

L Trombelli1, R Farina, S Ferrari

  • 1Research Centre for the Study of Periodontal Diseases, University of Ferrara, Ferarra, Italy. leonardo.trombelli@unife.it

Minerva Stomatologica
|June 12, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new objective periodontal risk assessment method, UniFe, showed good agreement with a computer-based tool (PAT®) in a specialist clinic population. This simplifies risk assessment for better patient care.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults
08:47

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults

Published on: February 2, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Periodontology
  • Dental Public Health
  • Risk Assessment Methodologies

Background:

  • Periodontal disease risk assessment is crucial for effective management.
  • Current methods can be complex, necessitating simpler, objective approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate UniFe, a novel, objective method for periodontal risk assessment.
  • To compare the performance of UniFe against a validated computer-based tool, PAT®.

Main Methods:

  • UniFe risk scores were calculated for 107 patients based on smoking, diabetes, probing depth, bleeding on probing (BoP), and bone loss/age.
  • PAT® generated risk scores for the same patient cohort.
  • Agreement between UniFe and PAT® was assessed using Cohen's kappa statistic.

Main Results:

  • Mean risk scores were similar: 4.5±0.9 for UniFe and 4.6±0.7 for PAT®.
  • A good agreement (Cohen's kappa = 0.7) was observed between the two risk assessment methods.
  • BoP and bone loss/age parameters significantly explained differences in risk scores between methods.

Conclusions:

  • The UniFe method demonstrates good agreement with the PAT® tool in a periodontal clinic setting.
  • UniFe offers a simplified and objective approach to periodontal risk assessment.
  • Findings support the utility of UniFe for routine clinical application.