Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control

Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control

Proportional-Derivative (PD) control is a widely used control method in various engineering systems to enhance stability and performance. In a system with only proportional control, common issues include high maximum overshoot and oscillation, observed in both the error signal and its rate of change. This behavior can be divided into three distinct phases: initial overshoot, subsequent undershoot, and gradual stabilization.
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...

Feedback control systems

Feedback control systems

Feedback control systems are categorized in various ways based on their design, analysis, and signal types.
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...

Effects of feedback

Effects of feedback

Feedback in control systems plays a critical role in shaping various operational parameters, extending beyond simple error reduction to influence stability, bandwidth, gain, impedance, and sensitivity. Understanding these effects requires examining a basic feedback system characterized by defined input, output, error, and feedback signals.
Feedback significantly modifies the gain of a control system. The gain of a system without feedback is altered by a factor of one plus GH, where G represents...

Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of PI Control

Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of PI Control

Proportional-Integral (PI) controllers are essential in many control systems to improve stability and performance. They are commonly used in everyday devices like thermostats to enhance system damping and reduce steady-state error. When the zero in the controller's transfer function is optimally placed, the system benefits significantly in terms of stability and accuracy.
Acting as a low-pass filter, the PI controller slows the system's response and extends settling times. This requires careful...

Open and closed-loop control systems

Open and closed-loop control systems

Control systems are foundational elements in automation and engineering. They are broadly categorized into open-loop and closed-loop systems. These classifications hinge on the presence or absence of feedback mechanisms, significantly influencing the system's performance, complexity, and application.
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal and...

Controller Configurations

Controller Configurations

Controller configurations are crucial in a car's cruise control system because they manage speed over time to maintain a consistent pace regardless of road conditions, thereby meeting design goals. In traditional control systems, fixed-configuration design involves predetermined controller placement. System performance modifications are known as compensation.
Control-system compensation involves various configurations, most commonly series or cascade compensation, in which the controller aligns...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Minimally invasive pulmonary valve replacement via left anterior mini-thoracotomy using an automated fastener-assisted suturing technique: a case report.

Journal of surgical case reports·2026

Same author

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation during short-term motor practice drives cortical plasticity without behavioural improvement.

The Journal of physiology·2026

Same author

Myoclonin1 haploinsufficiency in motile ciliated cells partially recapitulates epileptic features of Efhc1-deficient mice in adult age.

Molecular and cellular neurosciences·2026

Same author

Adversarial AI reveals mechanisms and treatments for disorders of consciousness.

Nature neuroscience·2026

Same author

Consensus Paper: Models of Cerebellar Functions.

Cerebellum (London, England)·2026

Same author

Extraction of robust functional connectivity patterns across psychiatric disorders using principal component analysis-based feature selection.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Design and Application of a Fault Detection Method Based on Adaptive Filters and Rotational Speed Estimation for an Electro-Hydrostatic Actuator

Design and Application of a Fault Detection Method Based on Adaptive Filters and Rotational Speed Estimation for an Electro-Hydrostatic Actuator

Published on: October 28, 2022

Feedforward impedance control efficiently reduce motor variability.

Rieko Osu¹, Ken-ichi Morishige, Hiroyuki Miyamoto

¹ATR Computational Neuroscience Laboratories, Kyoto 619-0288, Japan. osu@atr.jp

Neuroscience Research

|June 16, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

The central nervous system uses feedforward impedance control, not just online correction, to reduce motor variability and achieve precise human arm movements despite neural noise. This proactive regulation optimizes accuracy and stability.

More Related Videos

The Modular Design and Production of an Intelligent Robot Based on a Closed-Loop Control Strategy

The Modular Design and Production of an Intelligent Robot Based on a Closed-Loop Control Strategy

Published on: October 14, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Design and Application of a Fault Detection Method Based on Adaptive Filters and Rotational Speed Estimation for an Electro-Hydrostatic Actuator

Design and Application of a Fault Detection Method Based on Adaptive Filters and Rotational Speed Estimation for an Electro-Hydrostatic Actuator

Published on: October 28, 2022

The Modular Design and Production of an Intelligent Robot Based on a Closed-Loop Control Strategy

The Modular Design and Production of an Intelligent Robot Based on a Closed-Loop Control Strategy

Published on: October 14, 2017

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Motor Control
Biomechanics

Background:

Neural noise inherently causes variability in motor commands.
The central nervous system (CNS) effectively reduces movement variance to meet task demands.
Both online feedback correction and feedforward impedance control are mechanisms for regulating motor variability.

Purpose of the Study:

To review key studies on the relationship between task constraints and impedance control in human arm movement.
To elucidate the role of feedforward impedance control in reducing motor variability.
To explore computational models and learning algorithms for optimizing impedance control.

Main Methods:

Review of existing literature on human arm movement, task constraints, and impedance control.
Analysis of muscle activation patterns during reaching tasks with varying target sizes.
Examination of computational models and learning algorithms related to motor planning and control.

Main Results:

Task constraints, such as smaller reaching targets, lead to co-activation of flexor and extensor muscles, decreasing positional variance.
Analysis of muscle activations indicated feedforward impedance regulation rather than online feedback correction.
Feedforward impedance control, alongside online correction, contributes to reducing motor variability for dexterous movements.

Conclusions:

The CNS proactively regulates impedance in advance to minimize motor variability caused by neural noise.
Feedforward impedance control is a crucial strategy for achieving accurate and stable human arm movements.
Computational models and learning algorithms offer a framework for understanding how the CNS optimizes impedance for accuracy, stability, and efficiency.