Selection of live-related liver transplantation candidates

Beth A Rymeski1, Louise Flynn, Stephen P Dunn

  • 1Department of General Surgery, Alfred I duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE 19803, USA. brymeski@christianacare.org

Insights

Living donor liver transplantation (LR) in children offers comparable survival to cadaveric (CAD) grafts. LR is best for younger children with lower scores on the pediatric end-stage liver disease (PELD) scale, showing fewer early complications.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Hepatology
  • Transplant Surgery
  • Organ Transplantation

Background:

  • Living donor liver transplantation (LR) is a crucial alternative for pediatric patients with end-stage liver disease.
  • Comparing LR with cadaveric (CAD) donation outcomes is essential for optimizing donor selection and patient management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare outcomes between pediatric liver transplant recipients using living donor (LR) versus cadaveric (CAD) grafts.
  • To evaluate the impact of the pediatric end-stage liver disease (PELD) score on perioperative morbidity and mortality in LR versus CAD recipients.
  • To identify appropriate candidates for LR in pediatric liver transplantation.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of a transplant database and electronic medical records.
  • Inclusion of demographic data and outcome measures for pediatric liver transplant recipients from 2000 to 2008.
  • Comparison of graft and overall survival, patient age, PELD score, indications for transplantation, and perioperative complications between LR and CAD groups.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences in graft or overall survival at 3 months or 1 year between LR and CAD groups (n=81).
  • LR recipients were significantly younger (4.46 vs 7.41 years; P = .03) and had lower PELD scores (12.7 vs 22; P = .001).
  • LR recipients experienced fewer returns to the operating room within 30 days (13.9% vs 34.1%; P = .03) but had a higher rate of biliary stricture requiring reoperation (22.2% vs 2.3%; P = .005).

Conclusions:

  • Living donor liver transplantation is highly effective for selected pediatric patients, particularly those with parental donors and lower PELD scores.
  • A lower PELD score at the time of transplantation may be associated with a reduced incidence of postoperative complications requiring reoperation in LR recipients.
  • LR offers a viable alternative for pediatric liver transplantation, with careful patient selection being key to successful outcomes.
Abstract