An evaluation of the reliability of HIV partner notification disposition coding by disease intervention specialists in the United States
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

An Affordable HIV-1 Drug Resistance Monitoring Method for Resource Limited Settings
Published on: March 30, 2014
David A Katz1, Matthew Hogben, Samuel W Dooley
1Department of Epidemiology, International AIDS Research and Training Program, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Avenue, Box 359909, Seattle, WA 98104, USA. dkatz7@u.washington.edu
Insights
The reliability of CDC HIV partner notification (PN) disposition codes was evaluated. Codes are reliable for simple, verified outcomes but less so for partner-reported results, impacting HIV surveillance accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Infectious Disease Surveillance
Background:
- The reliability of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) HIV partner notification (PN) disposition codes has not been previously assessed.
- Accurate disposition codes are crucial for effective HIV surveillance and partner services.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the reliability of CDC HIV PN disposition codes used by Disease Intervention Specialists (DIS).
- To identify scenarios where code reliability may be compromised.
Main Methods:
- A questionnaire with vignettes describing PN interviews was administered to 136 DIS from 28 states.
- DIS indicated whether they would record a disposition and assigned specific codes based on interview scenarios.
Main Results:
- For simple, verified HIV testing outcomes, high agreement among DIS was observed (e.g., 93% recorded disposition for a new negative test).
- Reliability decreased in scenarios involving partner-reported outcomes or unverified results, leading to varied code usage (e.g., 7 different codes for one scenario).
Conclusions:
- CDC HIV PN disposition codes demonstrate reliability in straightforward cases with confirmed results.
- Code reliability is diminished when DIS rely on partner-reported information, potentially affecting data accuracy for HIV case management and prevention efforts.
Background:
The reliability of CDC HIV partner notification (PN) disposition codes has not been evaluated.
Methods:
Disease Intervention Specialists (DIS) working for health departments in high HIV/STD-morbidity metropolitan areas completed a questionnaire that presented vignettes describing PN interviews. Questionnaires asked DIS to indicate whether they would record a disposition and what codes they would assign to each partner.
Results:
A total of 136 DIS from 28 of 29 eligible states participated. Partner 1: The index case says he will inform his partner of his HIV diagnosis and, at follow-up, reports that the partner has tested negative. Seventeen percent of DIS indicated they would record a partner disposition. DIS used 7 different codes to define the PN outcomes. Partner 2: The index case says she will inform her partner, who attends the clinic, indicates no history of testing, and tests HIV-negative. 93% of DIS reported they would record a disposition, 90% of whom used code 6, "Not Previously Tested, New Negative." Partner 3: The index case with partner 2 (above) agrees to have DIS notify her second partner. When contacted, the partner tells DIS that he had previously tested negative and will arrange to be tested himself. He subsequently reports testing HIV-negative, but DIS do not confirm this. Seventy-three percent of DIS recorded a disposition for the partner, of whom 84% used code J, "Located, Refused Counseling and Testing."
Conclusions:
CDC HIV PN disposition codes are reliable for simple scenarios with verified outcomes, but less reliable when DIS elicit partner-reported outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Principles of Disease Surveillance
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Amebiasis
Sex Linked Disorders
