Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Estimation of the Physical Quantities

Estimation of the Physical Quantities

On many occasions, physicists, other scientists, and engineers need to make estimates of a particular quantity. These are sometimes referred to as guesstimates, order-of-magnitude approximations, back-of-the-envelope calculations, or Fermi calculations. The physicist Enrico Fermi was famous for his ability to estimate various kinds of data with surprising precision. Estimating does not mean guessing a number or a formula at random. Instead, estimation means using prior experience and sound...

Random Error

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...

Estimating Population Standard Deviation

Estimating Population Standard Deviation

When the population standard deviation is unknown and the sample size is large, the sample standard deviation s is commonly used as a point estimate of σ. However, it can sometimes under or overestimate the population standard deviation. To overcome this drawback, confidence intervals are determined to estimate population parameters and eliminate any calculation bias accurately. However, this only applies to random samples from normally distributed populations. Knowing the sample mean and...

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the Guinness...

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate + error bound)
The...

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

New Growth, New Opportunities.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2025

Same author

Influence of early through late fusion on pancreas segmentation from imperfectly registered multimodal magnetic resonance imaging.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2025

Same author

White matter hyperintensities and relapse risk in late-life depression.

Journal of affective disorders·2025

Same author

Unsupervised discovery of clinical disease signatures using probabilistic independence.

Journal of biomedical informatics·2025

Same author

Multi-contrast computed tomography atlas of healthy pancreas with dense displacement sampling registration.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2025

Same author

The effect of Alzheimer's disease genetic factors on limbic white matter microstructure.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

Robust estimation of spatially variable noise fields.

Bennett A Landman¹, Pierre-Louis Bazin, Seth A Smith

¹Johns Hopkins University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

|June 16, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel framework for estimating spatially variable noise fields in MRI scans. The new method significantly reduces errors, improving image analysis for faster MRI techniques.

More Related Videos

Simulating Imaging of Large Scale Radio Arrays on the Lunar Surface

Simulating Imaging of Large Scale Radio Arrays on the Lunar Surface

Published on: July 30, 2020

Topographical Estimation of Visual Population Receptive Fields by fMRI

Topographical Estimation of Visual Population Receptive Fields by fMRI

Published on: February 3, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

Simulating Imaging of Large Scale Radio Arrays on the Lunar Surface

Simulating Imaging of Large Scale Radio Arrays on the Lunar Surface

Published on: July 30, 2020

Topographical Estimation of Visual Population Receptive Fields by fMRI

Topographical Estimation of Visual Population Receptive Fields by fMRI

Published on: February 3, 2015

Area of Science:

Medical Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Image Processing

Background:

Spatially variable noise fields are increasingly important in MRI due to advanced artifact identification and statistical image processing.
Fast MRI methods, while improving image quality and enabling study of challenging targets, exacerbate spatial noise variability.
Traditional noise estimation methods are often inadequate for modern MRI protocols or too time-consuming.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a general framework for estimating spatially variable noise fields from independent MRI scans.
To provide a robust method for noise field estimation in the presence of artifacts.
To compare the proposed framework with existing noise estimation techniques.

Main Methods:

Proposed a novel framework using "noise field equivalent scans" (independent MR scans) for estimating spatially variable noise.
Generalized existing noise estimators (uniform regions, difference images, maximum likelihood) within the new framework.
Evaluated performance using simulations of diffusion tensor imaging and T(2)-relaxometry, and in vivo studies at 1.5T.

Main Results:

Achieved a 10-fold reduction in mean squared error for noise field estimation compared to traditional methods.
Demonstrated robustness of the proposed method to artifact contamination in simulations.
Successfully estimated spatially variable noise fields using typical in vivo MRI data.

Conclusions:

The proposed framework offers a significant improvement in spatially variable noise field estimation for MRI.
This method is effective even with artifact-laden data and is suitable for modern, fast imaging protocols.
Enables more accurate image analysis and processing in various MRI applications.