The relation between endothelial dependent flow mediated dilation of the brachial artery and coronary collateral

Aydan Ongun Ozdemir1, Sadi Gulec, Nihal Uslu

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. aongun@msn.com

Insights

This study found no link between brachial artery endothelial function, measured by flow-mediated dilation (FMD), and the development of coronary collaterals in patients with coronary stenosis. Systemic endothelial function does not appear to predict collateral growth.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Research
  • Vascular Biology
  • Interventional Cardiology

Background:

  • Endothelial dysfunction is a suspected factor in reduced coronary collateral formation.
  • Coronary collaterals play a vital role in myocardial perfusion during stenosis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the relationship between systemic endothelial function and the extent of coronary collateral development.
  • To determine if flow-mediated dilation (FMD) predicts collateralization in patients with significant coronary artery disease.

Main Methods:

  • Assessed endothelial function using flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery post-reactive hyperemia.
  • Graded coronary collateral extent (0-3) using Rentrop classification in 171 patients with high-grade coronary stenosis or occlusion.
  • Compared FMD and nitroglycerin-mediated dilation between patients with good (grade 2-3) and poor (grade 0-1) collaterals.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in FMD (11.5% vs 10.4%, p=0.214) or nitroglycerin-mediated dilation (13.4% vs 12.8%, p=0.521) was observed between good and poor collateral groups.
  • Patients with poor collaterals were more likely to have diabetes (p=0.001) and less likely to use statins (p=0.083).

Conclusions:

  • Systemic endothelial function, as assessed by brachial artery FMD, is not significantly associated with the extent of angiographically visible coronary collaterals.
  • These findings suggest endothelial function may not be a primary determinant of coronary collateral development in this patient cohort.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos