Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Control Systems01:10

Control Systems

Control systems are everywhere in contemporary society, influencing diverse applications from aerospace to automated manufacturing. These systems can be found naturally within biological processes, such as blood sugar regulation and heart rate adjustment in response to stress, as well as in man-made systems like elevators and automated vehicles. A control system is essentially a network of subsystems and processes that collaboratively convert specific inputs into desired outputs.
At the heart...
Feedback control systems01:26

Feedback control systems

Feedback control systems are categorized in various ways based on their design, analysis, and signal types.
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...
PI Controller: Design01:24

PI Controller: Design

Proportional Integral (PI) controllers are a fundamental component in modern control systems, widely used to enhance performance and mitigate steady-state errors. They are particularly effective in applications such as automatic brightness adjustment on smartphones, where they excel at mitigating steady-state errors for step-function inputs. Unlike PD controllers, which require time-varying errors to function optimally, PI controllers leverage their integral component to address residual...
Open and closed-loop control systems01:17

Open and closed-loop control systems

Control systems are foundational elements in automation and engineering. They are broadly categorized into open-loop and closed-loop systems. These classifications hinge on the presence or absence of feedback mechanisms, significantly influencing the system's performance, complexity, and application.
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal and...
Controller Configurations01:22

Controller Configurations

Controller configurations are crucial in a car's cruise control system because they manage speed over time to maintain a consistent pace regardless of road conditions, thereby meeting design goals. In traditional control systems, fixed-configuration design involves predetermined controller placement. System performance modifications are known as compensation.
Control-system compensation involves various configurations, most commonly series or cascade compensation, in which the controller aligns...
Integrator and Differentiator01:13

Integrator and Differentiator

Op-amp circuits have significant applications in various fields, including automotive engineering. One such application is cruise control systems in cars, where op-amp circuits are integral for maintaining a constant speed. In these systems, op-amps function as both integrators and differentiators.
An integrator within an op-amp circuit produces an output directly proportional to the integral of the input signal. This is achieved by replacing the feedback resistor in a typical inverting...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Line-of-sight optical turbulence and wind profile monitoring during free-space optical communication links.

Optics express·2026
Same author

Joint optical-digital design strategy for adaptive optics systems: application to wavelength selection for satellite imaging.

Optics express·2026
Same author

Predictive adaptive optics optimal control for LEO communications in low elevation and strong scintillation conditions.

Optics express·2025
Same author

<i>In vivo</i> structured illumination ophthalmoscopy demonstration on the human retina using adaptive optics.

Biomedical optics express·2025
Same author

Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor slope measurement algorithm robust to scintillation and sensor saturation.

Optics letters·2025
Same author

Fractional loop delays in adaptive optics modeling and control.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Bringing the Visible Universe into Focus with Robo-AO
10:35

Bringing the Visible Universe into Focus with Robo-AO

Published on: February 12, 2013

Optimal control, observers and integrators in adaptive optics.

Caroline Kulcsár, Henri-François Raynaud, Cyril Petit

    Optics Express
    |June 17, 2009
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study minimizes residual phase variance in adaptive optics (AO) loops using control engineering. A state-space model reveals that standard AO controllers can cause wind-up due to assuming constant turbulence.

    More Related Videos

    Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques
    09:01

    Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques

    Published on: April 4, 2017

    Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
    05:14

    Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

    Published on: September 16, 2025

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jun 22, 2026

    Bringing the Visible Universe into Focus with Robo-AO
    10:35

    Bringing the Visible Universe into Focus with Robo-AO

    Published on: February 12, 2013

    Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques
    09:01

    Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques

    Published on: April 4, 2017

    Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
    05:14

    Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

    Published on: September 16, 2025

    Area of Science:

    • Control Engineering
    • Optical Physics
    • Astronomy

    Background:

    • Adaptive optics (AO) systems are crucial for high-resolution imaging by correcting wavefront distortions.
    • Minimizing residual phase variance in AO loops is a fundamental challenge for system performance.
    • Existing AO controllers often lack a robust model for atmospheric turbulence, leading to suboptimal performance.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To address the fundamental issue of residual phase variance minimization in adaptive optics (AO) loops.
    • To analyze existing AO controllers from a control engineering perspective.
    • To identify limitations in current AO control strategies, specifically the wind-up effect.

    Main Methods:

    • Modeling the residual phase variance minimization problem using a state-space approach.
    • Decomposing the problem into optimal deterministic control and optimal estimation sub-problems.
    • Applying linear quadratic (LQ) control and Kalman filtering techniques.

    Main Results:

    • The state-space approach provides a framework for analyzing AO controllers.
    • Standard integrator-based AO controllers implicitly assume a constant turbulent phase.
    • This assumption in existing controllers leads to the wind-up effect.

    Conclusions:

    • A control engineering perspective offers valuable insights into AO loop performance.
    • Rethinking AO controller design can mitigate issues like wind-up.
    • Advanced control strategies are needed for optimal phase variance minimization in AO systems.