Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Effects of feedback01:24

Effects of feedback

Feedback in control systems plays a critical role in shaping various operational parameters, extending beyond simple error reduction to influence stability, bandwidth, gain, impedance, and sensitivity. Understanding these effects requires examining a basic feedback system characterized by defined input, output, error, and feedback signals.
Feedback significantly modifies the gain of a control system. The gain of a system without feedback is altered by a factor of one plus GH, where G represents...
Facial Feedback Hypothesis01:24

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role of...
False Memories01:18

False Memories

False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification01:17

Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification

Self-verification is a fundamental psychological drive wherein individuals seek affirmation of their self-concept from others, striving for consistency between their internal self-view and external perceptions. This drive operates even when the self-concept is negative, influencing interpersonal behavior and feedback preferences in complex and often counterintuitive ways. Unlike the self-enhancement motive, which seeks positive evaluations, self-verification prioritizes coherence and...
Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a bonus...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Unsupervised visual learning is revealed for task-irrelevant natural scenes due to reduced attentional suppression effects in visual areas.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Template-Based Label Propagation for Mouse Brain MRI Skull Stripping.

Neuroinformatics·2026
Same author

CRTC1 knockdown in the marmoset visual cortex induces neuronal IEG overexpression, HFOs, and neurodegeneration.

Neuroscience research·2026
Same author

Consensus Paper: Models of Cerebellar Functions.

Cerebellum (London, England)·2026
Same author

Extraction of robust functional connectivity patterns across psychiatric disorders using principal component analysis-based feature selection.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Brain/MINDS Marmoset Brain Atlas 2.0: Population Cortical Parcellation With Multi-Modal Templates.

Scientific data·2026
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Perceived direction of glass patterns can flip by 90°: A neural model.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Real-time fMRI Biofeedback Targeting the Orbitofrontal Cortex for Contamination Anxiety
10:51

Real-time fMRI Biofeedback Targeting the Orbitofrontal Cortex for Contamination Anxiety

Published on: January 20, 2012

Boosting perceptual learning by fake feedback.

Kazuhisa Shibata1, Noriko Yamagishi, Shin Ishii

  • 1ATR Computational Neuroscience Laboratories, Hikaridai 2-2-2, Seika-cho, Soraku-gun, Kyoto 619-0288, Japan. kazuhi-s@atr.jp

Vision Research
|June 18, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The brain enhances sensory plasticity by using optimistic fake feedback, showing that performance feedback uncertainty is evaluated internally. This suggests high-level cognitive processes control sensory learning.

More Related Videos

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games
06:25

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games

Published on: January 14, 2020

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Real-time fMRI Biofeedback Targeting the Orbitofrontal Cortex for Contamination Anxiety
10:51

Real-time fMRI Biofeedback Targeting the Orbitofrontal Cortex for Contamination Anxiety

Published on: January 20, 2012

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games
06:25

Stereoacuity Improvement using Random-Dot Video Games

Published on: January 14, 2020

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Perception

Background:

  • The brain exhibits sensory plasticity, adapting its processing based on experience.
  • Performance feedback is crucial for guiding learning and adaptation in sensory systems.
  • Understanding the neural mechanisms of feedback processing in sensory plasticity is an ongoing challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how the brain utilizes performance feedback to control sensory plasticity.
  • To explore the role of different types of feedback, including fake feedback, in perceptual learning.
  • To elucidate the computational principles underlying feedback-dependent sensory adaptation.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a perceptual learning paradigm with various types of fake feedback.
  • Compared learning rates under genuine feedback versus different fake feedback conditions.
  • Employed a computational model based on Bayesian inference to explain observed learning dynamics.

Main Results:

  • Fake feedback indicating greater performance improvement accelerated learning more than genuine feedback.
  • The variance of fake feedback influenced learning, indicating internal evaluation of feedback uncertainty.
  • A computational model incorporating optimistic bias successfully explained the observed effects.

Conclusions:

  • Sensory plasticity is modulated by the nature and uncertainty of performance feedback.
  • High-level cognitive processes, including optimistic biases, appear to regulate sensory learning.
  • Feedback processing in sensory plasticity may involve sophisticated internal evaluation mechanisms.