Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Distance Corrections01:15

Distance Corrections

To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Strabismic imaging for correcting in-plane motion distortion in scanning imaging instruments and rolling shutter cameras.

Advanced photonics·2026
Same author

Registration of 2D Images from Fast Scanning Ophthalmic Instruments.

Biomedical image registration, ... proceedings. WBIR (Workshop : 2006- )·2026
Same author

Automated montaging and contrast stretching of adaptive optics ophthalmoscope images.

Biomedical optics express·2026
Same author

Refractive adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope with fast 2D MEMS scanner.

Biomedical optics express·2026
Same author

Two-lens telecentric model eyes for image distortion measurement in adaptive optics ophthalmoscopes.

Biomedical optics express·2026
Same author

Automated animal gimbal steering for retinal imaging and stimulation.

Biomedical optics express·2026
Same journal

Denoising algorithm of Φ-OTDR systems based on adaptive fractional wavelet transform denoising.

Optics express·2026
Same journal

Millisecond photon-to-photon latency and high-speed volumetric projection system for optogenetics.

Optics express·2026
Same journal

Polarization-encoded coaxial structured light for high-precision 3D surface profilometry.

Optics express·2026
Same journal

Discrete freeform optical design based on collaborative optimization of point cloud and local normals.

Optics express·2026
Same journal

Ultrafast ghost imaging with 25 GHz speckle switching and wavelength-division multiplexing.

Optics express·2026
Same journal

Atomic vapor cells fabricated by femtosecond laser welding of standard-optical-quality glass.

Optics express·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Bringing the Visible Universe into Focus with Robo-AO
10:35

Bringing the Visible Universe into Focus with Robo-AO

Published on: February 12, 2013

Wavefront sensor and wavefront corrector matching in adaptive optics.

Alfredo Dubra

    Optics Express
    |June 18, 2009
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study proposes matching wavefront correctors and sensors by minimizing condition number and variance. Optimal lenslet numbers and alignment procedures are found, enabling high-performance adaptive optics with cost-effective sensors.

    More Related Videos

    Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
    05:14

    Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

    Published on: September 16, 2025

    Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping
    09:43

    Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping

    Published on: March 20, 2017

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jun 22, 2026

    Bringing the Visible Universe into Focus with Robo-AO
    10:35

    Bringing the Visible Universe into Focus with Robo-AO

    Published on: February 12, 2013

    Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
    05:14

    Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

    Published on: September 16, 2025

    Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping
    09:43

    Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping

    Published on: March 20, 2017

    Area of Science:

    • Optical Engineering
    • Adaptive Optics Systems

    Background:

    • Wavefront sensing and correction are crucial for high-resolution imaging.
    • Optimizing the match between wavefront correctors and sensors is essential for system performance.
    • Noise sources like photon, background, and electronic noise impact adaptive optics (AO) systems.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose a method for matching wavefront correctors and sensors.
    • To investigate optimal configurations for Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors and deformable mirrors under various noise conditions.
    • To provide an experimental procedure for optimal alignment.

    Main Methods:

    • Minimizing the condition number and mean wavefront variance to match components.
    • Analyzing specific cases: two continuous-sheet deformable mirrors and a Shack-Hartmann sensor with square packing.
    • Investigating the impact of photon noise, background noise, and electronics noise.
    • Determining the optimal number of lenslets per actuator for deformable mirrors.

    Main Results:

    • Optimal number of lenslets across each actuator were determined for both deformable mirrors.
    • A simple experimental procedure for optimal alignment was described.
    • High-performance adaptive optics can be achieved using cost-effective, off-the-shelf Shack-Hartmann arrays.
    • Lenslet spacing in the sensor does not necessarily need to match that of the corrector elements.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed method effectively matches wavefront correctors and sensors.
    • Optimal component matching and alignment procedures enhance adaptive optics performance.
    • Cost-effective Shack-Hartmann sensors can be utilized for high-performance AO systems, even with mismatched element spacing.