Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Mouse Genome Engineering Using Designer Nucleases
12:04

Mouse Genome Engineering Using Designer Nucleases

Published on: April 2, 2014

A new standard genetic map for the laboratory mouse.

Allison Cox1, Cheryl L Ackert-Bicknell, Beth L Dumont

  • 1The Jackson Laboratory, 600 Main Street, Bar Harbor, Maine 04609, USA.

Genetics
|June 19, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bone response to intermittent parathyroid hormone (PTH) is both genetic and sex specific.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Benchmarking genomic variant calling tools in inbred mouse strains: recommendations and considerations.

Genetics·2026
Same author

Modeling patient variants of <i>Cnot1</i> and <i>Cdc42bpb</i> results in distinct forms of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in mice.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Genes, other than Muc5b, are associated with bleomycin-induced lung injury.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

AI in biocuration: challenges, opportunities, and a roadmap for sustainable integration.

Bioinformatics advances·2026
Same author

Beyond the Prdm9 model: independent evolution of hybrid male sterility in house mice.

Heredity·2026

Researchers created a new mouse genome genetic map using 10,195 single nucleotide polymorphisms. This improved quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping by correcting errors in marker order, offering a more accurate view of recombination.

Area of Science:

  • Genomics and Genetics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Genetic maps estimate linked loci co-inheritance across generations.
  • Physical maps (DNA base pairs) are standard for genome navigation.
  • Recombination frequency varies along chromosomes and between sexes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To construct a revised, high-resolution genetic map of the mouse genome.
  • To integrate genetic and physical maps for improved genomic analysis.
  • To enhance quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized high-resolution genetic map data from a large mouse population.
  • Incorporated 10,195 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across 47 families (3546 meioses).

More Related Videos

A Non-random Mouse Model for Pharmacological Reactivation of Mecp2 on the Inactive X Chromosome
08:27

A Non-random Mouse Model for Pharmacological Reactivation of Mecp2 on the Inactive X Chromosome

Published on: May 22, 2019

Elevated Plus Maze for Mice
09:09

Elevated Plus Maze for Mice

Published on: December 22, 2008

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Mouse Genome Engineering Using Designer Nucleases
12:04

Mouse Genome Engineering Using Designer Nucleases

Published on: April 2, 2014

A Non-random Mouse Model for Pharmacological Reactivation of Mecp2 on the Inactive X Chromosome
08:27

A Non-random Mouse Model for Pharmacological Reactivation of Mecp2 on the Inactive X Chromosome

Published on: May 22, 2019

Elevated Plus Maze for Mice
09:09

Elevated Plus Maze for Mice

Published on: December 22, 2008

  • Integrated genetic and physical maps, including Short Sequence Length Polymorphisms (SSLP) markers.
  • Main Results:

    • Developed a revised mouse genome genetic map with a novel view of recombination.
    • Demonstrated improved QTL mapping accuracy using the revised genetic map.
    • Resolved previously undetected errors in chromosomal marker ordering.

    Conclusions:

    • The revised genetic map provides a more accurate representation of the mouse genome.
    • Improved marker ordering and integration of genetic/physical maps enhance genomic studies.
    • This work refines our understanding of recombination and its impact on genetic mapping.