Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Recording Brain Electromagnetic Activity During the Administration of the Gaseous Anesthetic Agents Xenon and Nitrous Oxide in Healthy Volunteers
Published on: January 13, 2018
The Narcotrend index indicates age-related changes during propofol induction in children
Sinikka Münte1, Jaakko Klockars, Mark van Gils
1Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Children's Hospital, Helsinki University Clinics, PL 281, 00029 HUS, Finland. sinikka.munte@hus.fi
Insights
The Narcotrend monitor partially tracks sedation changes during pediatric propofol anesthesia but has a high error rate. It should not be the sole tool for guiding anesthesia, as its accuracy varies with age.
Area of Science:
- Anesthesiology
- Pediatric Anesthesia
- Neurophysiology
Background:
- The Narcotrend electroencephalogram monitor assesses hypnotic state during anesthesia.
- Its effectiveness and reliability in children during propofol induction require evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the Narcotrend monitor's effectiveness in assessing hypnotic state and loss of consciousness (LOC) during propofol anesthesia induction in children.
- To assess the reliability and age-dependency of the Narcotrend index (NI).
Main Methods:
- Sixty-two children (aged 1-16 years) received propofol target-controlled infusion (TCI) for anesthesia induction.
- Hypnotic state was monitored using the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS), with LOC defined as UMSS 2 to 3.
- The Narcotrend index (NI) was recorded concurrently, and prediction probability (PK) was used to assess agreement between NI and UMSS.
Main Results:
- The Narcotrend index (NI) showed a prediction probability (PK) of 0.84 for detecting loss of consciousness (LOC) and 0.82 for agreement with UMSS.
- NI values differed significantly between sedation levels and age groups, with higher NI in younger children.
- Sensitivity and specificity for detecting consciousness were 0.67 and 0.79, respectively; correlation between propofol concentration and UMSS (0.96) was stronger than between NI and UMSS (-0.68).
Conclusions:
- The Narcotrend monitor partially tracks sedation changes during pediatric propofol induction but has a significant probability of incorrect prediction (0.18).
- The monitor's accuracy is age-dependent, with higher NI values in younger children at similar sedation levels.
- Sole reliance on the Narcotrend monitor for guiding pediatric anesthesia is not recommended.
Background:
The Narcotrend electroencephalogram monitor is designed to measure hypnotic state during anesthesia. We performed this study to evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of the Narcotrend monitor in assessing hypnotic state and loss of consciousness (LOC) during propofol anesthesia induction in children.
Methods:
Sixty-two children, aged 1-5 (n = 17), 6-12 (n = 23), and 13-16 (n = 21) yr, scheduled for elective surgery were studied. The patients were premedicated with oral midazolam 0.5 mg/kg. After IV access, propofol target controlled infusion (TCI) was started with 0.5 microg/mL and increased by 0.5 microg/mL increments every 2 min until the child did not respond to any verbal command or physical stimuli. A manual scheme was used for children weighing <15 kg. Hypnotic state was measured every minute from the start of the propofol infusion using the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS). LOC was defined as a transition of UMSS scale value 2 to 3. The Narcotrend index (NI) was recorded before the start of induction and during the whole study period. NI values were noted simultaneously, yet independently of the sedation measurements. Prediction probability (PK) was used to assess the correspondence between NI and UMSS. Sensitivity and specificity of NI for differentiating between consciousness and unconsciousness were calculated. NI values at specific UMSS levels were compared between the different age groups and the relationships between TCI propofol concentrations and sedation levels were assessed using correlation analysis.
Results:
A PK-value of 0.84 (95% CI [0.80-0.88]) of NI was calculated from the data for the detection of LOC. Similarly, a PK value of 0.82 (95% CI [0.78-0.86]) indicated agreement between NI and UMSS values. The average NI values differed between successive UMSS sedation levels 0 and 1 and levels 1 and 2 (P < 0.01). In the youngest age group, the NI discriminated between UMSS levels 2 and 3, in the second age group between levels 1 and 2 and 2 and 3, and in the oldest age group between 0 and 1. Furthermore, the NI values differed significantly between age groups at UMSS levels 1-4 (P < 0.005), with the NI values being higher in younger compared with older children. The average NI value at LOC was 68. For the detection of consciousness, a sensitivity of 0.67 and specificity of 0.79 were achieved. Spearman correlation coefficients indicated higher association between TCI propofol concentrations and UMSS (0.96) than between NI and UMSS (-0.68).
Conclusions:
During propofol induction in children, the Narcotrend electroencephalogram monitor was capable of following changes in the sedation level of children to some extent, but also had a relatively high probability (0.18) of incorrectly predicting changes in conscious state. Therefore, the monitor should not solely be used to guide sedation and anesthesia. NI was age-dependent and younger children had higher NI-values than older children at the same level of sedation.
Related Concept Videos
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Stages of General Anesthesia
Inhalational Anesthetics: Overview
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
