Functional dissection of Timekeeper (Tik) implicates opposite roles for CK2 and PP2A during Drosophila neurogenesis

Ezgi Kunttas-Tatli1, Anasua Bose, Bhaskar Kahali

  • 1Department of Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.

Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)
|June 19, 2009
PubMed

Insights

Protein kinase CK2 and phosphatase PP2A have opposing roles in regulating Notch signaling during development. This study reveals how CK2 and PP2A interact to control cell fate decisions.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Biology
  • Cell Signaling
  • Molecular Genetics

Background:

  • Notch (N) signaling is crucial for lateral inhibition, a process regulating cell fate during development.
  • Protein kinase CK2 is known to regulate E(spl)M8 repression during inhibitory N signaling.
  • The role of phosphatases in this process has remained largely uncharacterized.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the involvement of a phosphatase in the regulation of E(spl)M8 repression during N signaling.
  • To elucidate the functional relationship between protein kinase CK2 and phosphatases in N signaling.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a dominant-negative (DN) mutation (Tik) in the catalytic subunit of CK2 within a Gal4-UAS based assay.
  • Examined phenotypes in Drosophila melanogaster, including ectopic bristles and retinal defects, using gain-of-function alleles of N.
  • Performed functional dissection of mutations within Tik and overexpressed microtubule star (mts), the PP2A catalytic subunit.

Main Results:

  • Overexpression of Tik induced ectopic bristles in N(+) flies and suppressed retinal defects in N(spl) flies.
  • Mutations in Tik impairing ATP-binding and PP2A binding contributed to its dominant-negative effects.
  • Overexpression of mts mimicked the loss of CK2 function phenotypes and induced notched wings, characteristic of N mutations.

Conclusions:

  • Protein kinase CK2 and phosphatase PP2A play antagonistic roles in inhibitory Notch signaling.
  • The findings provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms regulating lateral inhibition and cell fate determination.

Related Concept Videos

M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis02:15

M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis

Checkpoints throughout the cell cycle serve as safeguards and gatekeepers, allowing the cell cycle to progress in favorable conditions and slow or halt it in problematic ones. This regulation is known as the cell cycle control system.
Cyclin-dependent kinases, or Cdks, work in concert with cyclins to control cell cycle transitions. M-Cdk, a complex of Cdk1 bound to M cyclin, is a well-known example of this coordinated control that drives the transition from the G2 to the M phase.
M cyclin...
Positive Regulator Molecules02:39

Positive Regulator Molecules

Mitotic cell division results in daughter cells that exactly resemble the parent cell. However, errors in the DNA replication or distribution of genetic material may lead to genetic mutations that may be passed down to every new cell formed from the resulting abnormal cell. Propagation of such mutant cells is restricted through checkpoint mechanisms present at different stages of the cell cycle. These checkpoints involve regulator molecules that either promote or demote cell cycle events.
Meiosis II02:02

Meiosis II

Meiosis II entails cell division and segregation of the sister chromatids, resulting in the production of four unique haploid gametes. The steps for meiosis II are similar to mitosis, except that meiosis II occurs in haploid cells, whereas mitosis occurs in diploid cells.
The timing and cell division patterns of meiosis differ between males and females. In male meiosis, the centrosomes are part of the formation of the meiotic spindle. However, in oocytes, including that of humans, Drosophila,...
Circadian Rhythms and Gene Regulation02:19

Circadian Rhythms and Gene Regulation

The biological clock is involved in many aspects of regulating complex physiology in all animals. It was in 1935 when German zoologists, Hans Kalmus and Erwin Bünning, discovered the existence of circadian rhythm in Drosophila melanogaster. However, the internal molecular mechanisms behind the circadian clock remained a mystery until 1984, when Jeffrey C. Hall, Michael Rosbash, and Michael W. Young discovered the expression of the Per gene oscillating over a 24-hour cycle. In subsequent years,...