[Spontaneous reperfusion of the infarct-related artery in patients with ST elevated myocardial infarction]
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Insights
Spontaneous reperfusion (SR) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients leads to a better clinical course and improved left ventricular function. Conservative treatment for SR patients is more effective than active interventions like angioplasty.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Internal Medicine
- Emergency Medicine
Background:
- ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a critical condition requiring timely reperfusion.
- Spontaneous reperfusion (SR) of coronary arteries occurs in a subset of STEMI patients.
- Understanding the clinical course and optimal management of SR in STEMI is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize the clinical course of STEMI with spontaneous reperfusion (SR).
- To compare the effectiveness of conservative versus active treatment strategies for SR patients.
- To evaluate outcomes after reperfusion therapies like thrombolytic therapy (TLT) and/or transluminal balloon coronary angioplasty (TBCA).
Main Methods:
- Studied 479 STEMI patients admitted within 6 hours of onset.
- Included patients with SR, and those treated with TLT and/or TBCA.
- Detailed analysis of 149 SR patients comparing conservative and active treatment.
Main Results:
- SR occurred in 10.2% of STEMI cases, earlier than reperfusion therapies.
- SR patients had less Q-MI, right ventricular infarction, heart failure, and AV block.
- SR patients showed higher left ventricular ejection fraction and no "no reflow" phenomenon compared to non-SR patients.
Conclusions:
- Early SR in STEMI is associated with a more favorable clinical course, less myocardial damage, and better left ventricular function.
- Conservative management of STEMI patients with SR is more effective than active reperfusion if adequately monitored.
- SR patients benefit from a less invasive approach, provided close patient monitoring is maintained.
Aim:
To characterize a clinical course of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and spontaneous reperfusion of the coronary arteries (SR) as well as in patients after reperfusion thrombolytic therapy (TLT) and/or transluminal balloon coronary angioplasty (TBCA); to compare effectiveness of different approaches to treatment of SR patients: conservative--early medication and active--TBCA on the first postmyocardial 24 hours.
Material And Methods:
We studied 479 patients admitted to hospital not later than 6 hours since STEMI onset and either having SR (n = 49) or treated using active methods of coronary circulation restoration--prehospital thrombolysis (n = 127), thrombolysis after hospitalization (n = 127), primary TBCA (n = 60) and TBCA after initiation of TLT (n = 116). We made a more detailed analysis on the sample of 149 SR patients.
Results:
SR was diagnosed in 10.2% cases with STEMI and occurred much earlier than recovery of coronary circulation due to TLT and/or TBCA. Patients with SR developed Q-MI, right ventricular infarction, cardiac failure and atrioventricular block less frequently. They had the lowest peak activity of creatin phosphokinase and a higher left ventricular ejection fraction versus patients without SR (50.7 +/- 6.8 and 45.4 +/- 6.6%, respectively; p < 0.05). As shown by coronaroangiography, SR patients had no "no reflow" phenomenon (0% and 17%, respectively). Active policy of SR patients treatment had no significant advantages over conservative treatment.
Conclusion:
Early SR had more favourable course of MI, less mass of the affected myocardium and better contractile function of the left ventricle. The conservative policy of STEMI treatment in the presence of SR is more effective than the active one if a due control over the patients' condition is provided.
Related Concept Videos
Ischemic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

