Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

09:23
JenaTron - An Experimental Approach to Study the Effects of Plant History and Soil History on Grassland Ecosystem Functioning
Published on: March 21, 2025
Trophic diversity in two grassland ecosystems.
1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA. cpearso@tulane.edu
Journal of Insect Science (Online)
|June 23, 2009
Summary
Community diversity is driven by either top-down consumer forces or bottom-up resource forces. This study in Colorado grasslands shows management practices determine whether top-down or bottom-up forces control arthropod diversity.
Area of Science:
- Community Ecology
- Ecosystem Dynamics
- Trophic Interactions
Background:
- Understanding the drivers of biodiversity, specifically alpha diversity, is crucial in community ecology.
- Trophic theory, examining top-down (consumer) and bottom-up (resource) forces, provides a framework for community structure.
- The interplay between these forces and their impact on insect diversity across trophic levels requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the direct and indirect interactions between plants and arthropod communities.
- To determine the influence of trophic interactions on arthropod diversity in grassland ecosystems.
- To compare the effects of top-down versus bottom-up forces on insect diversity under different management regimes.
Main Methods:
- Field study conducted in July 2001 at Carpenter Ranch, North-Central Colorado, comparing managed (grazed-irrigated) and unmanaged riparian grasslands.
- Measurement of plant and insect diversity across multiple trophic levels.
- Path analysis to elucidate the strength and direction of interactions between trophic levels.
Main Results:
- Plant abundance and richness were significantly higher in grazed-irrigated pastures compared to unmanaged fields.
- In managed fields, top-down forces prevailed: increased enemy diversity reduced herbivore diversity, subsequently decreasing plant abundance.
- In unmanaged fields, bottom-up forces dominated: increased plant diversity led to higher herbivore diversity, which in turn increased enemy diversity.
Conclusions:
- Management practices significantly influence whether top-down or bottom-up forces regulate community diversity.
- Cascading effects of diversity changes at one trophic level impact other trophic levels, even non-adjacent ones.
- Findings support existing hypotheses on the conditional dominance of top-down versus bottom-up forces in ecological communities.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
What is an Ecosystem?
Overview
Diversity of Protists II
Alveolates are a group of organisms recognized by the presence of alveoli, which are cytoplasmic sacs located beneath the cell membrane. While their function remains uncertain, alveoli may help regulate water balance by controlling how much water enters and leaves the cell. In dinoflagellates, these structures may serve as armor plates. There are three major types of alveolates: ciliates, which move using cilia; dinoflagellates, which use flagella for movement; and apicomplexans, which are...
What is Biodiversity?
Biodiversity describes the variety of living things at multiple organizational levels: genetic, species and ecosystem diversity. Species diversity includes all branches of the evolutionary tree from single-celled prokaryotic organisms, bacteria, and archaea, to the eukaryotic kingdoms: plants; animals; fungi; and protists. To date, there have been about 1.75 million species identified, and new species are discovered every week.
Diversity of Protists III
Rhizaria are a diverse group of unicellular protists characterized by their threadlike cytoplasmic extensions known as pseudopodia. These structures aid in both locomotion and feeding, giving Rhizaria an amoeboid appearance. Their amoeboid morphology once led to taxonomic confusion, but molecular phylogenetics has clarified their evolutionary placement and emphasized their shared use of pseudopodia despite divergent lineages.This clade comprises diverse lineages such as Chlorarachniophyta,...
Diversity of Protists I
Excavata is a diverse group of protists that includes both chemoorganotrophic and phototrophic species, with some thriving in anaerobic environments. Among the key groups within Excavata are diplomonads and parabasalids, which are flagellated protists that lack mitochondria and chloroplasts. These microorganisms typically inhabit anoxic environments, such as the intestines of animals, where they exist either symbiotically or as parasites, relying on fermentation for energy production. Some...
Diversity of Protists IV
Amoebozoa represent a diverse group of terrestrial and aquatic protists that utilize lobe-shaped pseudopodia for locomotion and feeding. This characteristic differentiates them from the Rhizaria, which possess threadlike pseudopodia. The primary classifications within Amoebozoa include gymnamoebas, entamoebas, and the plasmodial and cellular slime molds. Phylogenetic evidence indicates that Amoebozoa diverged from a lineage that ultimately gave rise to fungi and animals.Gymnamoebas and...

