Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Prospective, Randomized, and Controlled Study of a Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell Injection for Treating Diabetic Foot Ulcers
Published on: March 3, 2023
Defining success in clinical trials of diabetic foot wounds: the Los Angeles DFCon consensus
David G Armstrong1, Andrew J M Boulton, George Andros
1Southern Arizona Limb Salvage Alliance, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, 85701, AZ, USA. armstrong@usa.net
Abstract:
Regulatory requirements for new products should be guided by clinical trials that protect the public by a thorough evaluation of safety and efficacy, while not creating unnecessary barriers to their development and ultimate approval. While healing a wound is the ultimate goal of treating an individual with a diabetic foot ulcer, achieving this goal is physiologically complex requiring the initiation and interaction of many events and therefore unlikely to be achieved by one compound. We believe that developing new, more meaningful, study outcomes or end points in wound care trials would both aid in determining the true efficacy of wound management modalities and facilitate the product development cycle. The primary guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration to industry in this field was published in 2006. This document, while helpful and largely in concert with current knowledge of wound healing, needs to be substantially improved. We therefore convened an interdisciplinary task force comprising experts in various aspects of wound care to attempt to achieve consensus in defining primary outcomes and potential secondary endpoints for various classes of wound-healing modalities.
Insights
Developing better clinical trial endpoints for wound healing products is crucial. This will ensure patient safety and product efficacy while streamlining the regulatory process for diabetic foot ulcer treatments.
Area of Science:
- Wound healing research
- Biomedical engineering
- Regulatory science
Background:
- Diabetic foot ulcers present complex healing challenges, often requiring multifaceted treatment approaches.
- Current regulatory guidance for wound care products, established in 2006, needs updating to reflect advancements in wound healing science.
- Existing clinical trial endpoints may not adequately capture the efficacy of novel wound management modalities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose improved, meaningful study outcomes and endpoints for wound care clinical trials.
- To facilitate the development and approval process for new wound healing products.
- To establish consensus on primary outcomes and secondary endpoints for various wound healing modalities.
Main Methods:
- Convened an interdisciplinary task force of wound care experts.
- Reviewed existing regulatory guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
- Focused on achieving consensus for defining primary outcomes and secondary endpoints.
Main Results:
- Identified the need for more effective clinical trial endpoints in wound healing.
- Highlighted the complexity of wound healing, suggesting single-compound efficacy is unlikely.
- Initiated a process to redefine primary outcomes and secondary endpoints for wound care trials.
Conclusions:
- Revised clinical trial endpoints are essential for accurately assessing wound management efficacy.
- Updated guidance will support the development of safe and effective wound healing products.
- Consensus-driven endpoint definition will improve regulatory pathways and patient care for diabetic foot ulcers.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetic Foot Ulcer
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Diabetic Retinopathy
Diabetic Neuropathy
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management