Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Deductive Reasoning

Deductive Reasoning

Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction from inductive reasoning. It uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From these general principles, a scientist can predict specific results that remain valid as long as the general principles are correct.For example, a researcher can make specific predictions from the hypothesis "butterflies are attracted...

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...

Reasoning

Reasoning

Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...

Reason and Intuition

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...

Counterfactual Thinking

Counterfactual Thinking

Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in human cognition.Types of...

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Imaginative Thought.

Journal of cognition·2026

Same author

Inference and Imagination.

Topics in cognitive science·2026

Same author

Mistakes in Thinking about Cognitive Science and How to Reduce Them.

eNeuro·2024

Same author

Reasoning From Quantified Modal Premises.

Cognitive science·2024

Same author

Reasoning about possibilities: Modal logics, possible worlds, and mental models.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2024

Same author

Introduction to Progress and Puzzles of Cognitive Science: Introduction to a Wiley Virtual Issue.

Cognitive science·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

'If' and the problems of conditional reasoning.

Ruth M J Byrne¹, P N Johnson-Laird

¹School of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, Lloyd Building, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland. rmbyrne@tcd.ie

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

|June 23, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Understanding the word "if" is key to human reasoning. This study explores psychological theories, suggesting the mental model theory best explains conditional reasoning and artificial intelligence development.

More Related Videos

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Philosophy of Mind
Artificial Intelligence

Background:

The meaning of 'if' has been debated for over two millennia.
Seven core problems related to the interpretation of 'if' persist in psychological theories.
Existing theories offer competing explanations for conditional reasoning.

Purpose of the Study:

To analyze how major psychological theories address the problems posed by 'if'.
To evaluate the strengths of different theoretical approaches to conditional reasoning.
To identify the most promising theory for understanding human reasoning and AI.

Main Methods:

Review and comparison of prominent psychological theories of 'if'.
Analysis of how each theory handles the seven key problems of conditional statements.
Evaluation of theoretical frameworks based on their explanatory power for human reasoning.

Main Results:

Competing theories interpret 'if' variously: as formal logic, mental model construction, or suppositional instruction.
The mental model theory is presented as a more viable approach than formal logic or simple suppositional accounts.
Progress in understanding 'if' is crucial for both human cognition and AI.

Conclusions:

The mental model theory offers a more robust framework for understanding conditional reasoning.
Resolving the puzzle of 'if' is essential for advancing cognitive science and AI.
Further research into mental models can bridge the gap in understanding human-like reasoning.