Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
The role of risk-taking and errors in children's liability to unintentional injury
Richard Rowe1, Barbara Maughan
1Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TP, UK. r.rowe@sheffield.ac.uk
Insights
Understanding childhood injury requires distinguishing between errors and risk-taking behaviors. This study found both independently relate to injury history and mediate links between behavioral issues and unintentional injuries in children.
Area of Science:
- Child Psychology
- Pediatric Injury Prevention
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- Childhood injuries have heterogeneous causes, with potential distinctions between risk-taking and error-related processes.
- Understanding these distinct processes is crucial for effective injury prevention strategies in children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if errors represent a distinct process from risk-taking in children.
- To determine if errors and risk-taking mediate the relationship between emotional/behavioral problems and unintentional injuries.
Main Methods:
- Developed and validated the parent-report Children's Injury Related Behaviour (CIRB) questionnaire for errors and risk-taking.
- Utilized principal components analysis on data from 499 children aged 4-11 years.
- Examined associations between risk, error, emotional/behavioral problems, and injury history.
Main Results:
- A two-factor solution confirmed distinct scales for risk and error with good psychometric properties.
- Both risk and error scales were independently associated with injury history.
- Errors correlated with conduct problems, emotional problems, and hyperactivity; risk-taking with conduct problems and hyperactivity.
- Risk-taking and errors explained the association between conduct problems/hyperactivity and injury involvement.
Conclusions:
- The distinction between risk-taking and errors is significant in understanding childhood unintentional injuries.
- These findings have implications for targeted research and interventions aimed at reducing pediatric injuries.
Abstract:
There is likely to be heterogeneity in the processes putting children at risk of injury. This paper examines whether errors may form a dissociable process from risk-taking. We further examine whether these constructs mediate the links between emotional and behavioural problems and unintentional injury. We designed the parent-report Children's Injury Related Behaviour (CIRB) questionnaire to measure errors and risk-taking in everyday activities. The sample consisted of 499 children aged 4-11 years recruited from the community. Principal components analysis showed that a two factor solution was appropriate and provided scales to measure risk and error with good psychometric properties. Both risk and error scales were independently related to injury history. Errors were associated with conduct problems, emotional problems and hyperactivity. Risk-taking was associated with conduct problems and hyperactivity only. Risk-taking and errors accounted for the links of conduct problems and hyperactivity with injury involvement. The distinction between risk and error has implications for research and interventions to reduce childhood injuries.
Related Concept Videos
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Torts I
Intentional...
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Social Foundations of Self I: Play and Game
Fundamental Attribution Error
The Availability Heuristic

