Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Mouse Model of Acute to Chronic Kidney Disease Transition Induced by Renal Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury
Published on: February 10, 2026
[Approach of renal parenchyma infection: retrospective study of period 2005-2007]
José Antonio Pérez Arbej1, María Isabel Cameo Rico
1Servicio de Urología, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Lozano Blesa. japereza@salud.aragon.es
Background:
The renal parenchyma acute infection, known as acute pyelonephritis (APN), is diagnosed and treated in some Hospital Departments of the H.C.U. Lozano Blesa. We want to know if the process was made in a homogeneous way, fixed to the described quality standards and if we could detect improvement areas.
Methods:
Retrospective study in admitted patients with the diagnosis of APN over and 2 year period (11-05/10-07), evaluating some variables referred to epidemiological data, diagnosis, treatment and evolution.
Results:
We studied 118 patients (80.5% women, mean age 34 years), that supposed 0.39% of patients admitted from the Emergency Department (36% in Urology and the rest in Paediatric, Obstetric, Internal Medicine and others).45% showed risk factors (urinary anomalies, diabetes, pregnancy, immunosuppressant, ...), and it is considered complicated APN (CAPN). In children there was a high rate of urinary tract malformations. Diagnosis was clinical in 82.2%. The rest required imaging techniques, specially children, using gamma scan. In 82.7% there was leukocyturia and in 79.9% leukocytosis. A urine culture pre-treatment was made in 76.3%, with a positive rate of 55.5%, detecting negative Gram germs in 94% (E. coli in 82%). Treatment was empiric in all cases, based on cephalosporin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and fluoroquinilones. Evolution was favorable in 93.1% (95.1% of NCAPN and 85.7% of CAPN). The mean hospital stay was 6.4 days (5.6 in NCAPN and 7.5 in CAPN).
Conclusions:
Acute pyelonephritis management in our hospital is highly satisfactory and similar to the revised medical literature. We could emphasize the low rate of urinary cultures pretreatment (negative in quite a lot of the cases, due to early beginning of antibiotic treatment) and that mean hospital stay could be reduced in CAPN. We want to congratulate all involved professionals at the hospital for the good practice demonstrated.
Insights
This study evaluated acute pyelonephritis (APN) management in a hospital, finding it highly satisfactory. While most cases resolved well, reducing hospital stays for complicated APN (CAPN) presents an improvement area.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Infectious Diseases
- Hospital Management
Context:
- Acute pyelonephritis (APN) is a common renal infection requiring standardized care.
- Assessing care homogeneity and identifying improvement areas in APN management is crucial for quality improvement.
Purpose:
- To evaluate the homogeneity and quality of acute pyelonephritis (APN) diagnosis and treatment processes.
- To identify potential areas for improvement in APN patient management within the hospital.
Summary:
- A retrospective study of 118 APN patients revealed generally favorable outcomes (93.1% recovery).
- Diagnosis was primarily clinical (82.2%), with E. coli being the most common pathogen (82%).
- Treatment was empiric, with a 6.4-day average hospital stay, noting potential for reduction in complicated APN (CAPN).
Impact:
- The hospital's APN management aligns with established medical literature, demonstrating high satisfaction.
- Highlights the need for optimizing pre-treatment urine cultures and reducing hospital stays for CAPN.
- Emphasizes the importance of consistent quality standards in managing renal infections.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Acute Pyelonephritis I: Introduction
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Acute Kidney Injury II: Pathophysiology
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
