Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Application of Bedside Lower Extremity Rehabilitation Robots in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Published on: November 28, 2025
Structured re-assessment system at 6 months after a disabling stroke: a randomised controlled trial with resource use
Anne Forster1, John Young, John Green
1Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK. a.forster@leeds.ac.uk
Routine re-assessment for stroke patients and carers at six months did not improve patient independence or reduce carer stress. While the intervention group used fewer hospital and care home bed days, overall costs and outcomes were similar.
Area of Science:
- Rehabilitation medicine
- Health services research
- Geriatric medicine
Background:
- National policy advocates for routine re-assessment of disabled stroke patients and their carers at 6 months post-stroke.
- The clinical effectiveness and resource implications of this policy require investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical and resource outcomes of a structured, systematic re-assessment policy for stroke patients and their carers at 6 months post-stroke.
- To determine if this policy improves patient independence and reduces carer stress.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted in two centers.
- 265 patients with disabling stroke and their carers were recruited.
- The intervention involved a structured re-assessment system at 6 months post-stroke, compared to existing care.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in patient independence (Frenchay Activities Index) at 12 months post-stroke between groups (adjusted mean difference 0.64).
- No significant difference in carer emotional distress (General Health Questionnaire 28) at 12 months post-stroke between groups (mean difference 0.02).
- Secondary outcomes and total mean costs were similar; however, the intervention group used fewer hospital and care home bed days.
Conclusions:
- A structured, systematic re-assessment for stroke patients and carers at 6 months did not demonstrate clinically significant benefits at 12 months.
- Health and social care resource utilization and mean costs per patient were comparable between the intervention and control groups.
More Related Videos
05:28Application of a Dual Upper Limb Task-Oriented Robotic System for the Functional Recovery of the Upper Limb in Stroke Patients
Published on: October 11, 2024
08:53Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
Published on: June 6, 2025