Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Estimating exposure using kriging: a simulation study.

D Wartenberg1, C Uchrin, P Coogan

  • 1Department of Environmental and Community Medicine, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway 08854.

Environmental Health Perspectives
|August 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The risk wars: assessing risk assessment.

New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS·2012
Same author

Ambient air pollutant concentrations during pregnancy and the risk of fetal growth restriction.

Journal of epidemiology and community health·2009
Same author

Residential mobility and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: an ecological study.

British journal of cancer·2007
Same author

Causal relationship between trichloroethylene exposure and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Occupational and environmental medicine·2007
Same author

Childhood leukaemia incidence and the population mixing hypothesis in US SEER data.

British journal of cancer·2004
Same author

Development of a method for extraction of methyl tert-butyl (MTBE) from soil samples.

Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering·2002
Same journal

A New Start.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
Same journal

Time-Varying Exposure to Element Mixtures and Children's Cognition at 5 Years of Age: Findings from the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
Same journal

Effect of Household Air Pollution on the Gut Microbiome and Virome of Adult Women Living in Uganda.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
Same journal

Comparison of Temperature-Mortality Associations across the Middle East Using Different Exposure Estimation Approaches.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
Same journal

Workflow for Statistical Analysis of Environmental Mixtures.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
Same journal

Effects of Extreme Heat Exposure on Heatstroke and Liver Injury in Mice: The Role of PPARα.

Environmental health perspectives·2026
See all related articles

Estimating groundwater contamination exposure is challenging. This study found that while kriging is statistically optimal, simpler methods like nearest neighbor and inverse distance squared weighting are comparable for exposure assessment and easier to implement.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Epidemiology
  • Geostatistics

Background:

  • Retrospective disease studies often face limitations due to low-resolution exposure measurements.
  • Estimating individual exposure in contaminated groundwater studies requires extrapolation from limited well data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare three extrapolation methods for estimating individual groundwater contamination exposure.
  • To evaluate nearest neighbor interpolation, inverse distance squared weighting, and kriging.

Main Methods:

  • Applied two naive groundwater contamination models.
  • Compared nearest neighbor interpolation, inverse distance squared weighting, and kriging for exposure estimation.
  • Assessed performance based on limited measurement data.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Kriging, though statistically optimal, did not significantly outperform simpler interpolation methods.
  • Nearest neighbor and inverse distance squared weighting offered comparable results to kriging.
  • Aberrant measurements and data discontinuities posed challenges for all interpolation techniques.

Conclusions:

  • Simpler interpolation methods can be effective for estimating groundwater exposure, despite kriging's statistical advantages.
  • Method complexity should be considered alongside statistical optimality.
  • Further research is needed for a comprehensive comparison of interpolation methodologies.