Oxidative stress implication after prolonged storage donor heart with blood versus crystalloid cardioplegia and...

Several factors are known to limit cardiac transplantation, such as number of donors, quality of cardiac graft preservation, and ischemia-reperfusion injury. Some mechanisms of reperfusion injury are now recognized; they include oxygen free radical (OFR), white blood cells activation, changes in calcium influx, alteration of microvascular blood flow, and sympathetic activation. The goal of this study was to assess the effects of two types of cardioplegia with long-term storage, either static or continuous perfusion, in 30 isolated sheep hearts as a model for heart transplantation. We examined myocardial function, histology, ischemic damage, and markers of oxidative stress. Two types of cardioplegia and storage conditions using a Langendorff reperfusion were studied in a combined approach: crystalloid (CP) [groups I and III] or cold oxygenated autologous blood (BC) [groups II and IV], immediate storage during 8h in profound hypothermia (groups I and II), or reperfused with crystalloid (group III), or blood cardioplegia (group IV). All perfusate samples were drawn from the coronary sinus. Lactate levels increased progressively in groups I, II, and IV, but not in group III, as no significant elevation was shown [90 min: 13.6+/-1.7 versus 5.2+/-1.0 mmol/L (P<0.01)]. Arrhythmias were more frequent when using BC (n=5) than CP (n=0). For plasma thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) levels a significant difference was found between group III and the other groups since 15 to 90 min (P<0.05). Vitamin E concentration decreased significantly from 5 min for groups II and IV, 15 min for group I, and 30 min for group III, with a significant difference between groups II and IV (P<0.05) but not between groups I and III. CP followed by a reperfusion with the same solution showed a significantly lower ischemic injury and OFR production, less frequent ventricular arrhythmias while stable hemodynamic parameters carried on. However, this protocol did not act on the early postoperative contractile function.