Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

13:16
Computed Tomography and Optical Imaging of Osteogenesis-angiogenesis Coupling to Assess Integration of Cranial Bone Autografts and Allografts
Published on: December 22, 2015
[Gingivoperiosteoplasty associated to bone graft: radiological evaluation]
F-X Boland1, S Drikes, S Persac
1Service de chirurgie maxillofaciale et stomatologie, CHU de Rouen, 1, rue de Germont, 76000 Rouen, France. Francois-Xavier.Boland@chu-rouen.fr
Revue De Stomatologie Et De Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale
|June 27, 2009
Summary
Gingivoperiosteoplasty with bone grafting shows satisfactory radiological results in patients up to 20 years old. Panoramic radiography offers a viable assessment method, though cone beam computed tomography may offer superior evaluation for alveolar cleft repair.
Area of Science:
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Pediatric Dentistry
- Craniofacial Anomalies
Background:
- Gingivoperiosteoplasty with bone grafting is a key treatment for alveolar clefts in patients up to 20 years old.
- Management is multidisciplinary, with bone grafting often recommended during mixed dentition.
- Retroalveolar and panoramic radiography are commonly used to assess bone height post-grafting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To retrospectively evaluate the radiological outcomes of gingivoperiosteoplasty associated with bone grafting.
- To assess the effectiveness of panoramic radiography in evaluating alveolar bone height after grafting.
- To compare results based on patient age at surgery and cleft laterality.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 57 alveolar bone grafts in 44 patients (1999-2005).
- Panoramic radiographs were analyzed one year post-surgery by a single expert.
- Bone height was graded relative to adjacent teeth; grades 1-2 considered satisfactory.
Main Results:
- 84.2% of grafts achieved satisfactory bone height (grades 1 and 2).
- 81% of patients grafted during mixed dentition showed good results.
- No significant difference in outcomes was found between early and delayed surgery or in patients with lateral incisor agenesis.
Conclusions:
- Gingivoperiosteoplasty with bone grafting yields satisfactory radiological results and is a reproducible procedure.
- Panoramic radiography provides a useful, though less precise, assessment compared to advanced imaging.
- Cone beam computed tomography is suggested as the optimal method for evaluating alveolar cleft repair outcomes.
